If I have a List<List<Object>>
, how can I turn that into a List<Object>
that contains all the objects in the same iteration order by using the features of Java 8?

- 41,989
- 11
- 82
- 128

- 10,345
- 9
- 37
- 60
12 Answers
You can use flatMap
to flatten the internal lists (after converting them to Streams) into a single Stream, and then collect the result into a list:
List<List<Object>> list = ...
List<Object> flat =
list.stream()
.flatMap(List::stream)
.collect(Collectors.toList());

- 1,145
- 20
- 39

- 387,369
- 54
- 702
- 768
-
15@arshajii true, but for some reason I prefer the lambda expression. Perhaps I don't like the look of `::` :) – Eran Aug 05 '14 at 19:55
-
38`Class::method` feels a little weird at first, but it has the benefit that it declares what kind of object you are mapping from. That is something you otherwise lose in streams. – ArneHugo Mar 15 '16 at 15:13
-
3Yet you might want to have a container of a List and in that case you might need to use the lambda (l->l.myList.stream()). – Myoch Dec 22 '16 at 10:18
-
2If you need to do explicit casting (array of primitives to List for example) then lambdas may be necessary as well. – Michael Fulton May 28 '17 at 03:58
-
7Since Java 16, `.toList()` may be used instead of `.collect(Collectors.toList())`. – malamut Sep 06 '22 at 18:00
flatmap
is better but there are other ways to achieve the same
List<List<Object>> listOfList = ... // fill
List<Object> collect =
listOfList.stream()
.collect(ArrayList::new, List::addAll, List::addAll);
-
2Note that using flatMap you will not close the stream, because with the collect you will need to reopen it again. – Georgi Peev May 10 '21 at 10:53
The flatMap
method on Stream
can certainly flatten those lists for you, but it must create Stream
objects for element, then a Stream
for the result.
You don't need all those Stream
objects. Here is the simple, concise code to perform the task.
// listOfLists is a List<List<Object>>.
List<Object> result = new ArrayList<>();
listOfLists.forEach(result::addAll);
Because a List
is Iterable
, this code calls the forEach
method (Java 8 feature), which is inherited from Iterable
.
Performs the given action for each element of the
Iterable
until all elements have been processed or the action throws an exception. Actions are performed in the order of iteration, if that order is specified.
And a List
's Iterator
returns items in sequential order.
For the Consumer
, this code passes in a method reference (Java 8 feature) to the pre-Java 8 method List.addAll
to add the inner list elements sequentially.
Appends all of the elements in the specified collection to the end of this list, in the order that they are returned by the specified collection's iterator (optional operation).

- 176,041
- 30
- 275
- 357
-
8Good alternative suggestion that avoids some unnecessary allocations. Would be interesting to see the top heap usage of this when working with some larger collections, to see how they compare to each other. – Per Lundberg Jul 10 '19 at 12:51
Method to convert a List<List>
to List
:
listOfLists.stream().flatMap(List::stream).collect(Collectors.toList());
See this example:
public class Example {
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<List<String>> listOfLists = Collections.singletonList(Arrays.asList("a", "b", "v"));
List<String> list = listOfLists.stream().flatMap(List::stream).collect(Collectors.toList());
System.out.println("listOfLists => " + listOfLists);
System.out.println("list => " + list);
}
}
It prints:
listOfLists => [[a, b, c]]
list => [a, b, c]
In Python this can be done using List Comprehension.
list_of_lists = [['Roopa','Roopi','Tabu', 'Soudipta'],[180.0, 1231, 2112, 3112], [130], [158.2], [220.2]]
flatten = [val for sublist in list_of_lists for val in sublist]
print(flatten)
['Roopa', 'Roopi', 'Tabu', 'Soudipta', 180.0, 1231, 2112, 3112, 130, 158.2, 220.2]

- 1,353
- 1
- 12
- 7
Just as @Saravana mentioned:
flatmap is better but there are other ways to achieve the same
listStream.reduce(new ArrayList<>(), (l1, l2) -> {
l1.addAll(l2);
return l1;
});
To sum up, there are several ways to achieve the same as follows:
private <T> List<T> mergeOne(Stream<List<T>> listStream) {
return listStream.flatMap(List::stream).collect(toList());
}
private <T> List<T> mergeTwo(Stream<List<T>> listStream) {
List<T> result = new ArrayList<>();
listStream.forEach(result::addAll);
return result;
}
private <T> List<T> mergeThree(Stream<List<T>> listStream) {
return listStream.reduce(new ArrayList<>(), (l1, l2) -> {
l1.addAll(l2);
return l1;
});
}
private <T> List<T> mergeFour(Stream<List<T>> listStream) {
return listStream.reduce((l1, l2) -> {
List<T> l = new ArrayList<>(l1);
l.addAll(l2);
return l;
}).orElse(new ArrayList<>());
}
private <T> List<T> mergeFive(Stream<List<T>> listStream) {
return listStream.collect(ArrayList::new, List::addAll, List::addAll);
}

- 7,420
- 4
- 53
- 63
I just want to explain one more scenario like List<Documents>
, this list contains a few more lists of other documents like List<Excel>
, List<Word>
, List<PowerPoint>
. So the structure is
class A {
List<Documents> documentList;
}
class Documents {
List<Excel> excels;
List<Word> words;
List<PowerPoint> ppt;
}
Now if you want to iterate Excel only from documents then do something like below..
So the code would be
List<Documents> documentList = new A().getDocumentList();
//check documentList as not null
Optional<Excel> excelOptional = documentList.stream()
.map(doc -> doc.getExcel())
.flatMap(List::stream).findFirst();
if(excelOptional.isPresent()){
Excel exl = optionalExcel.get();
// now get the value what you want.
}
I hope this can solve someone's issue while coding...

- 850
- 10
- 13
You can use the flatCollect()
pattern from Eclipse Collections.
MutableList<List<Object>> list = Lists.mutable.empty();
MutableList<Object> flat = list.flatCollect(each -> each);
If you can't change list from List
:
List<List<Object>> list = new ArrayList<>();
List<Object> flat = ListAdapter.adapt(list).flatCollect(each -> each);
Note: I am a contributor to Eclipse Collections.

- 1,152
- 11
- 10
-
32why use a third party dependency when the functionality is provided by Java 8? – saw303 Oct 20 '17 at 08:34
-
3Eclipse Collections API is on the collection itself, so the code is concise, is one of the main reasons in this case. – Nikhil Nanivadekar Oct 21 '17 at 18:18
An expansion on Eran's answer that was the top answer, if you have a bunch of layers of lists, you can keep flatmapping them.
This also comes with a handy way of filtering as you go down the layers if needed as well.
So for example:
List<List<List<List<List<List<Object>>>>>> multiLayeredList = ...
List<Object> objectList = multiLayeredList
.stream()
.flatmap(someList1 -> someList1
.stream()
.filter(...Optional...))
.flatmap(someList2 -> someList2
.stream()
.filter(...Optional...))
.flatmap(someList3 -> someList3
.stream()
.filter(...Optional...))
...
.collect(Collectors.toList())
This is would be similar in SQL to having SELECT statements within SELECT statements.

- 536
- 7
- 15
-
-
In my years of experience, recursion in languages like Java is dangerous because it is very easy to eat all of your system's resources by accident. You could do it, but I wouldn't. But maybe an alternative would be to use a loop to build a nested stream, then run the stream. You can't really have an infinite loop in streams from my understanding. – cody.tv.weber Apr 22 '21 at 20:58
Since java-16, you can use Stream#mapMulti
List<Object> result = listOfLists.stream()
.mapMulti((List<Object> list, Consumer<Object> consumer) -> {
list.forEach(consumer::accept);
})
.collect(Collectors.toList());
If you need an immutable List
you can even use toList()
as terminal operation
List<Object> result = listOfLists.stream()
.mapMulti((List<Object> list, Consumer<Object> consumer) -> {
list.forEach(consumer::accept);
})
.toList();

- 21,337
- 9
- 51
- 89
We can use flatmap for this, please refer below code :
List<Integer> i1= Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4);
List<Integer> i2= Arrays.asList(5, 6, 7, 8);
List<List<Integer>> ii= Arrays.asList(i1, i2);
System.out.println("List<List<Integer>>"+ii);
List<Integer> flat=ii.stream().flatMap(l-> l.stream()).collect(Collectors.toList());
System.out.println("Flattened to List<Integer>"+flat);

- 81
- 2
Below code should work:-
List<Object> result = new ArrayList<>();
listOfLists.forEach(result::addAll);

- 47
- 5
List<List> list = map.values().stream().collect(Collectors.toList());
List<Employee> employees2 = new ArrayList<>();
list.stream().forEach(
n-> employees2.addAll(n));

- 47
- 1
-
-
3Please have a read of [this](https://stackoverflow.com/editing-help) help page about how to format code properly. Also, you can [edit] your answer at any time, rather than posting followup comments. – costaparas Jan 24 '21 at 06:46
-
1While this code may solve the question, [including an explanation](//meta.stackexchange.com/q/114762) of how and why this solves the problem would really help to improve the quality of your post, and probably result in more up-votes. Remember that you are answering the question for readers in the future, not just the person asking now. Please [edit] your answer to add explanations and give an indication of what limitations and assumptions apply. – Yunnosch Jan 26 '21 at 06:35
-