1

I found @font-face is good alternative of sIFR3 but every browser need different extension of font. so implementing is more than sIFR3.

But very good thing is FLASH and Javascript not needed.

Is there any cons to use @font-face in compare to sIFR3? I need compatibility in all A-Grade Browsers.

and

If any font which is freely available as a download on net or if font is purchased and provided by client or font is purchased by my company. in all condition can i use those fonts?

Jitendra Vyas
  • 148,487
  • 229
  • 573
  • 852

4 Answers4

2

You can use @font-face with:

For IE, the fallback is working great, but be sure to use the little hack for smooth rendering: http://allcreatives.net/2009/12/05/smoother-font-face-embedding-in-ie-7-8/

Issues :

Glorfindel
  • 21,988
  • 13
  • 81
  • 109
ideotop
  • 184
  • 6
1

You may want to check out Cufon (http://cufon.shoqolate.com) or Typekit (http://typekit.com/) as well.

user304469
  • 94
  • 1
0

The worst is probably the delay for downloading the font where you'll see the original font first then, after a short delay, the downloaded font.

iirc, you don't need a different font extension for every browser. Only IE is different from all the others, as usual.

Rob
  • 14,746
  • 28
  • 47
  • 65
  • but this the problem with sIFR also. no we need different for other browsers also see here http://www.littleboxofideas.com/blog/tutorials/how-do-i-implement-font-face – Jitendra Vyas Apr 01 '10 at 12:04
  • woff is new on Firefox but it still uses otf. Notice the article shows all the browsers work with otf, except IE, of course. – Rob Apr 01 '10 at 17:40
0

The biggest disadvantage of this technique right now is the browsers that support it.

See how people are trying to circumvent this disadvantage here: http://blog.themeforest.net/tutorials/how-to-achieve-cross-browser-font-face-support/

Ivo Sabev
  • 5,230
  • 1
  • 26
  • 38