76

The challenge

The shortest code by character count that will output the numeric equivalent of an Excel column string.

For example, the A column is 1, B is 2, so on and so forth. Once you hit Z, the next column becomes AA, then AB and so on.

Test cases:

A:    1
B:    2
AD:   30
ABC:  731
WTF:  16074
ROFL: 326676

Code count includes input/output (i.e full program).

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Vivin Paliath
  • 94,126
  • 40
  • 223
  • 295

67 Answers67

339

Excel, 9 chars :)

Use the right tool for the job:

=COLUMN()

=COLUMN()

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Danko Durbić
  • 7,077
  • 5
  • 34
  • 39
  • 166
    Use the right language for the job: Portuguese Excel `=COL()`. 6 characters. (See http://dolf.trieschnigg.nl/excel/excel.html ) – Debilski Apr 14 '10 at 11:03
  • 21
    Great! only it does not support `ROFL` though. – YOU Apr 14 '10 at 11:14
  • I'm torn between accepting this and the Ruby solution (which is the shortest). Excel really isn't a "language" but still, this is pretty clever :). SO community - what do you think? – Vivin Paliath Apr 14 '10 at 17:07
  • 6
    I think you should accept my 12 character J solution, but I might be biased. :) – David Apr 14 '10 at 21:24
  • 63
    This solution even reproduces the limitations of Excel correctly. – kibibu Apr 15 '10 at 03:55
  • I've decided to go with this one even though it's not a true programming language. Mainly because of how clever it is :) – Vivin Paliath Apr 15 '10 at 16:12
  • 1
    @Vivin: Excel is of course a true programming language. http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/3563/microsoft_excel_revolutionary_3d_.php – kennytm Apr 16 '10 at 13:49
  • 18
    It doesn't even take a string as input. Doesn't come close to doing what the problem said. It only works if it's in the column that happens to be named after the string in question. Totally not in the spirit of the question. – phkahler Apr 16 '10 at 14:51
  • 9
    To be fair, Code Golf is *made* for these kinds of smartass answers. So you get a +1 from me. – Reynolds Apr 16 '10 at 18:30
96

Perl, 36 34 33 31 30 17 15 11 characters

$_=()=A..$_

Usage:

$ echo -n WTF | perl -ple '$_=()=A..$_'
16074

Reduced to 17 by using echo -n to avoid a chop call.

Reduced to 15 by using say instead of print.

Reduced to 11 by using -p instead of say.

Explanation: A is evaluated in string context and A..$_ builds a list starting at "A" and string-incrementing up to the input string. Perl interprets the ++ operator (and thus ..) on strings in an alphabetic context, so for example $_="AZ";$_++;print outputs BA.

=()= (aka "goatse" operator) forces an expression to be evaluated in list context, and returns the number of elements returned by that expression i.e., $scalar = () = <expr> corresponds to @list = <expr>; $scalar = @list.

jfs
  • 399,953
  • 195
  • 994
  • 1,670
David
  • 7,011
  • 1
  • 42
  • 38
71

J, 17 12 10 characters

26#.64-~av

Example:

26#.64-~av  'WTF'
16074

Explanation:

  • J parses from right to left.
  • av returns a list of the ascii indexes of each of the characters in its argument, so for example av'ABC' returns 65 66 67.
  • Then we subtract 64 from each element of that list with the verb 64-~.
  • Then we convert the list to base 26 using the #. verb.
David
  • 7,011
  • 1
  • 42
  • 38
  • 2
    After reading a few comments about how the Excel solution really doesn't take a string input, I'm going to go with the solution that is the shortest, and actually takes a string input. – Vivin Paliath Apr 16 '10 at 16:44
  • Wow a J solution I can actually understand :) – Callum Rogers Apr 16 '10 at 21:49
  • 2
    @Brandon: J is made for everything, as long as you don't mind spending years learning how to read it. – David Apr 16 '10 at 23:19
55

Brainf*ck, 81 characters (no whitespace)

,[>>>[->>+++++[-<+++++>]<+<]>[-<+>]<<++++++++[<++++++++>-]<[<->-]<[>>>+<<<-],]>>>

Explanation

,[  // get character input into p[0], enter loop if it isn't null (0)
>>>[->>+++++[-<+++++>]<+<] // take what's in p[3] and multiply by 26, storing it in p[4]
>[-<+>] // copy p[4] back to p[3]
<<++++++++[<++++++++>-]< // store 64 in p[1]
[<->-]< // subtract p[1], which is 64, from the input char to get it's alphabetical index
[>>>+<<<-] // add p[0] to p[3]
,] // get another character and repeat
>>> // move to p[3], where our final result is stored

So you'll notice I didn't actually convert the numerical value to an ascii string for printing. That would likely ruin the fun. But I did the favor of moving the pointer to the cell with the result, so at least it's useful to the machine.

Hey, what do you know, I beat C#!

Tesserex
  • 17,166
  • 5
  • 66
  • 106
31

Ruby 1.8.7, 53 50 46 44 24 17 characters

p ('A'..$_).count

Usage:

$ echo -n ROFL | ruby -n a.rb
326676
$ echo -n WTF | ruby -n a.rb
16074
$ echo -n A | ruby -n a.rb
1
Community
  • 1
  • 1
Mark Rushakoff
  • 249,864
  • 45
  • 407
  • 398
23

APL

13 characters

Put the value in x:

x←'WTF'

then compute it with:

26⊥(⎕aV⍳x)-65

The only reason J beat me is because of the parentheses. I'm thinking there should be some way to rearrange it to avoid the need for them, but it's been a long day. Ideas?

(Heh, you perl programmers with your 30+ character solutions are so cute!)

Ken
  • 346
  • 1
  • 4
  • Maybe 26⊥⁻65+⎕aV⍳x instead? That is how you write negative 65 in APL, right? – Kragen Javier Sitaker Apr 16 '10 at 21:52
  • I don't have my APL environment in front of me right now, but I think I tried something like that and it didn't work. Off the top of my head (and admittedly I'm the furthest thing from an APL wizard!) ⁻ is equivalent to - and since it evaluates right-to-left it's applied after the +, so you end up with 26⊥⁻(65+(⎕aV⍳x)) instead of 26⊥((⁻65)+⎕aV⍳x), which is what you need here. – Ken Apr 19 '10 at 16:59
  • Accepted Perl solution beats your code by two characters... =) – kolistivra May 01 '10 at 20:49
14

Excel (not cheating), 25 chars

Supports up to XFD:

=COLUMN(INDIRECT(A1&"1"))

Installation:

  1. Put the formula in cell A2.

Usage:

  1. Enter the column string in cell A1.
  2. Read the result at cell A2.

54 chars, plus a lot of instructions

Supports ROFL also:

(A2)  =MAX(B:B)
(B2)  =IFERROR(26*B1+CODE(MID(A$1,ROW()-1,1))-64,0)

Installation:

  1. Clear the whole spreadsheet.
  2. Put the formula (A2) in cell A2.
  3. Put the formula (B2) in cell B2.
  4. Fill formula (B2) to as far down as possible.

Usage:

  1. Enter the column string in cell A1.
  2. Read the result at cell A2.
kennytm
  • 510,854
  • 105
  • 1,084
  • 1,005
13

C# 156 146 118 Chars

using System.Linq;class P{static void Main(string[]a){System.Console.Write(
a[0].Aggregate(0,(t,c)=>(t+c-64)*26)/26);}}

Ungolfed:

using System.Linq;
class P
{
    static void Main(string[] a)
    {
        System.Console.Write(a[0]
            .Aggregate(0, (t, c) => (t + c - 64) * 26) / 26);
    }
}
Community
  • 1
  • 1
Cameron MacFarland
  • 70,676
  • 20
  • 104
  • 133
12

Golfscript - 16 chars

[0]\+{31&\26*+}*


$ echo -n WTF | ./golfscript.rb excel.gs
16074
$ echo -n ROFL | ./golfscript.rb excel.gs
326676
John La Rooy
  • 295,403
  • 53
  • 369
  • 502
11

Haskell, 50 51 56 chars

main=interact$show.foldl(\x->(26*x-64+).fromEnum)0

Usage:

~:166$ echo -n "ROFL" | ./a.out
326676
~:167$ echo -n "WTF" | ./a.out
16074
kennytm
  • 510,854
  • 105
  • 1,084
  • 1,005
9

Python, 64 49 characters

s=0
for c in raw_input():s=26*s+ord(c)-64
print s

You can also replace raw_input() with input() to reduce the character count by 4, but that then requires the input to contain quotation marks around it.

And here's a subroutine that clocks in at 47 characters:

f=lambda x:len(x)and 26*f(x[:-1])+ord(x[-1])-64
Adam Rosenfield
  • 390,455
  • 97
  • 512
  • 589
  • your #2 should be named f. Try running it now, it doesn't work. And it can be made shorter(47 characters) with the help of lambdas and short circuit evaluation: `f=lambda x:len(x)and 26*f(x[:-1])+ord(x[-1])-64` – Ponkadoodle Apr 17 '10 at 01:02
  • @wallacoloo: Thanks. It's a community wiki, so you can feel free to make edits any time. – Adam Rosenfield Apr 17 '10 at 05:26
  • how about dropping len(x) for x alone? becomes 43 chars: f=lambda x:x and 26*f(x[:-1])+ord(x[-1])-64 – Nas Banov May 14 '10 at 22:16
9

k4 (kdb+), 11 characters

26/:1+.Q.A?

Explanation:

  • k4 parses left of right
  • .Q.A is defined within k4 - it is the vector "ABC...XYZ"
  • ? is the find operator - the index of the first match for items in the y arg within the x arg
  • +1 to offset the index
  • 26/: to convert to base 26

One caveat - this will only work where listed types are passed in:

  26/:1+.Q.A? "AD"
30

  26/:1+.Q.A? "WTF"
16074

but:

  26/:1+.Q.A? ,"A"
1
Stéphan Kochen
  • 19,513
  • 9
  • 61
  • 50
Ciarán
  • 11
  • 3
8

JavaScript 1.8: 66 characters

function a(p)Array.reduce(p,function(t,d)t*26+d.charCodeAt()-64,0)

Javascript 1.8: 72 characters

function a(p)(t=0,p.replace(/./g,function(d)t=t*26+d.charCodeAt()-64),t)

JavaScript 1.6: 83 characters

function a(p){t=0;p.split("").map(function(d){t=t*26+d.charCodeAt(0)-64});return t}

JavaScript: 95 characters

function a(p){r=0;t=1;l=p.length;for(i=0;i<l;i++){r+=(p.charCodeAt(l-1-i)-64)*t;t*=26}return r}

JavaScript: 105 characters

function a(p,i){i=i||0;l=p.length;return p?(p.charCodeAt(l-1)-64)*Math.pow(26,i)+a(p.slice(0,l-1),i+1):0}

Usage:

a("A")        // 1
a("B")        // 2
a("AD")       // 30
a("ABC")      // 731
a("WTF")      // 16074
a("ROFL")     // 326676
Casey Chu
  • 25,069
  • 10
  • 40
  • 59
Daniel Vassallo
  • 337,827
  • 72
  • 505
  • 443
8

Powershell, 42 chars

[char[]]$args[($s=0)]|%{$s=$s*26+$_-64};$s
Community
  • 1
  • 1
Danko Durbić
  • 7,077
  • 5
  • 34
  • 39
6

Scala, 30 chars

print((0/:args(0))(_*26+_-64))" 

Example:

C:\>scala -e "print((0/:args(0))(_*26+_-64))" AD
30
Daniel C. Sobral
  • 295,120
  • 86
  • 501
  • 681
5

C89, 58 characters

s;main(c){while(c=getchar()+1)s=26*s+c-65;printf("%d",s);}

The input (stdin) must contain only A-Z, no other characters (including newlines) are allowed.

Adam Rosenfield
  • 390,455
  • 97
  • 512
  • 589
  • 1
    `getchar()` returns `< 0` on EOF; EOF is not defined as -1, but it's common. – strager Apr 14 '10 at 08:25
  • @strager: Good point. Ensuring full portability would then require adding 2 characters (by changing `c=getchar()+1` to `(c=getchar())>=0` and `65` to `64`). But, this should work in almost any C implementation. – Adam Rosenfield Apr 14 '10 at 15:09
5

Explanation of Concepts - Excelcification

Nice. I wrote my own version of this with a little more explanation a long time ago at http://aboutdev.wordpress.com/2009/12/19/excelcification-brain-teaser-code/. Although it's not quite an optimized version!

FYI. The base 26 arithmetic is called hexavigesimal and Excel's maximum column is XFD which converts to 16383 (using 0 as the first cell) which is coincidentally exactly 2^14 cells.

Can anyone guess as to why it is 2^14??

AboutDev
  • 1,923
  • 1
  • 23
  • 33
  • 5
    May be they want to use only 64k memory at that time :-) – YOU Apr 14 '10 at 08:13
  • Because they wanted to be able to do offsets (x-y) which requires a sign bit. But that's only 15bits, so what's up with the 16th bit? Is it used as a flag? – phkahler Apr 16 '10 at 14:56
  • 1
    This is not *exactly* base-26, because it has no 0. If we let A represent 1, and multiply with `26^n` for position `n` (with `n = 0` for the rightmost letter), it all works out as usual. – Thomas Apr 16 '10 at 15:22
  • @phkahler: With 1 bit, you can represent all unsigned integers in the range 0..2^0. Thus, with 16 bits, you can represent 0..2^15. Take away 1 bit for the sign, the maximum value will be 2^14-1 (=16383). – stakx - no longer contributing Apr 16 '10 at 18:08
  • 1
    @phkahler: you don't need a sign bit to represent offsets as long as you don't need a distinguished representation for out-of-bounds values (i.e. you can check the processor overflow bit to see if you're out of bounds). – Kragen Javier Sitaker Apr 16 '10 at 21:55
  • @stakx: Nice trick... But 1 bit can represent 0..2^**1**-1. 16 bits is 0..2^**16**-1. Take away 1 bit for the sign, the maximum value will be 2^**15**-1 (=32767). If you don't believe me, try it with 2 bits. 2 bits is not 0..2^1 = 0..2. You have 00, 01, 10, 11 = 0, 1, 2, 3 in base10 respectively. – Ponkadoodle Apr 17 '10 at 01:09
  • @wallacoloo: Oops. You're right of course; what was I thinking! – stakx - no longer contributing Apr 17 '10 at 02:00
5

Common Lisp, 103 128 characters

(defun x(s)(reduce(lambda(x y)(+(* 26 x)y))(map 'vector(lambda(b)(-(char-code b)(char-code #\A)-1))s)))
Community
  • 1
  • 1
Paul Richter
  • 6,154
  • 2
  • 20
  • 22
5

C#, 117 111 chars

No contest compared to the likes of Perl, Ruby and APL but an improvement on the other C#/Java answers given so far.

This uses Horner's rule.

class C{static void Main(string[]a){int t=0;foreach(var c in a[0]){t=(t+c-64)*26;}System.Console.Write(t/26);}}
Community
  • 1
  • 1
Daniel Renshaw
  • 33,729
  • 8
  • 75
  • 94
  • 1
    You can save 3 chars by removing the space between the [] and the 'a', and the foreach braces. – Cameron MacFarland Apr 16 '10 at 17:09
  • I didn't know string implemented IEnumerable. Sweet! Unfortunately the page about Horner's rule is way over my head, but clearly a winning strategy. I don't like using Console.Write() though, due to the messy output. +1 – Igby Largeman May 10 '10 at 19:32
4

Perl, 34 characters

map$\=26*$\-64+ord,pop=~/./g;print

Thanks to mobrule for several suggestions.

  • You can say `pop=~/./g` instead of `split//,$ARGV[0]` You can omit the `$_` in the `ord` call. You can use `$\` instead of `$s` and then just say `print`. – mob Apr 14 '10 at 06:48
4

Ruby 1.9, 21 characters

p'A'.upto(gets).count

Tests:

$ echo -n A| ruby x.rb
1
$ echo -n WTF| ruby x.rb
16074
$ echo -n ROFL| ruby x.rb
326676
YOU
  • 120,166
  • 34
  • 186
  • 219
4

C#, 148 chars

using System;class P{static void Main(string[]a){var r=0d;int j=0,i=a[0].
Length;while(i-->0)r+=(a[0][i]-64)*Math.Pow(26,j++);Console.WriteLine(r);}}

Ungolfed:

using System;
class P
{
    static void Main(string[] a)
    {
        var r = 0d;
        int j = 0, i = a[0].Length;
        while (i-- > 0)
            r += (a[0][i] - 64) * Math.Pow(26, j++);

        Console.WriteLine(r);
    }
}
Community
  • 1
  • 1
Igby Largeman
  • 16,495
  • 3
  • 60
  • 86
4

Python - 63 chars

>>> f=lambda z: reduce(lambda x,y: 26*x+y, [ord(c)-64 for c in z])

>>> f('ROFL')

326676

4

Common Lisp, 86 characters.

(defun z(s)(let((a 0))(map nil(lambda(v)(setf a(+(* 26 a)(digit-char-p v 36)-9)))s)a))
Ponkadoodle
  • 5,777
  • 5
  • 38
  • 62
4

Clojure:

user> (reduce #(+ (* 26 %1) %2) (map #(- (int %) 64) "AD"))
30
user> (reduce #(+ (* 26 %1) %2) (map #(- (int %) 64) "ROFL"))
326676

51 characters, plus the number of characters in the input string.

jimbokun
  • 133
  • 2
  • 9
4

C:

int r=0;
while(*c)r=r*26+*c++-64;

String is stored in 'c', value is in 'r'.

fluffy
  • 5,212
  • 2
  • 37
  • 67
3

in VBA I got it down to 98

Sub G(s)
Dim i, t
For i = 0 To Len(s) - 1
    t = t + ((Asc(Left(Right(s, i + 1), 1)) - 64)) * ((26 ^ i))
Next
MsgBox t
End Sub
Anonymous Type
  • 3,051
  • 2
  • 27
  • 45
Kevin Ross
  • 7,185
  • 2
  • 21
  • 27
  • 3
    Surely you don't need the indentation. –  Apr 14 '10 at 08:28
  • You don't need to declare the sub as Public, and nor do you need to say "Next i" (just use "Next"). Also, I think if you loop from 1 rather than zero you can shave off a character or two. – Gary McGill Apr 16 '10 at 14:59
  • @Gary, thanks for the tips, this is my first "round" of code golf I'm sure I will get better after a few more goes – Kevin Ross Apr 16 '10 at 20:14
3

Ruby, 20 characters

p('A'..$*[0]).count

Usage:

$ ruby a.rb ABC
731
Community
  • 1
  • 1
Jonas Elfström
  • 30,834
  • 6
  • 70
  • 106
3

PHP - 73 Chars

$n=$argv[1];$s=$i=0;while($i<strlen($n))$s=$s*26+ord($n[$i++])-64;echo$s;

Usage:

php -r '$n=$argv[1];$s=$i=0;while($i<strlen($n))$s=$s*26+ord($n[$i++])-64;echo$s;' AA

> 27
Kevin Vaughan
  • 14,320
  • 4
  • 29
  • 22
  • 1
    You could lose 10 characters by removing the curly braces around your while function and dumping the variable initialization. – Twipped Apr 16 '10 at 17:23
3

Java: 112 124 characters

class C{public static void main(String[]a){int r=0;for(int b:a[0].getBytes())r=26*r+b-64;System.out.print(r);}}
Ron
  • 1,932
  • 20
  • 17
Robin
  • 3,993
  • 1
  • 19
  • 8
3

Common Lisp, 81 characters

(defun y(s)(reduce(lambda(x y)(+(* 26 x)(-(char-code y)64)))s :initial-value 0))

Funny that as a new user I can post my own answer but not comment on someone else's. Oh well, apologies if I'm doing this wrong!

Vivin Paliath
  • 94,126
  • 40
  • 223
  • 295
Dr. Pain
  • 689
  • 1
  • 7
  • 16
3

MATLAB: 24 characters

polyval(input('')-64,26)

Usage:

>> polyval(input('')-64,26)
(after pressing enter) 'WTF'

ans =

       16074

Note: You can get it down to 16 characters if you pre-store the string in x, but I kind of thought it was cheating:

>> x = 'WTF'

x =

WTF

>> polyval(x-64,26)

ans =

       16074
rlbond
  • 65,341
  • 56
  • 178
  • 228
2

APL: 7 characters

Store desired string in variable w:

w←'rofl'

Assuming characters are lowercase:

26⊥⎕a⍳w

Assuming characters are uppercase:

26⊥⎕A⍳w

Mixed case or unsure of case (14 chars, but could possibly be improved):

26⊥⊃⌊/⎕a⎕A⍳¨⊂w
2

Perl, 120 characters

chomp($n=<>);@c=split(//,uc($n));$o=64;$b=0;$l=$#c;for($i=$l;$i>=0;$i--){$b+=((26**($l-$i))*(ord($c[$i])-$o));}print$b;

Usage:

vivin@serenity ~/Projects/code/perl/excelc
$ echo WTF | perl e.pl
16074
vivin@serenity ~/Projects/code/perl/excelc
$ echo ROFL | perl e.pl
326676

I'm sure some of the Perl gurus here can come up with something way smaller.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Vivin Paliath
  • 94,126
  • 40
  • 223
  • 295
2

Perl, 47 characters (from stdin)

chop($l=<>);$_=A;$.++,$_++while$_ ne$l;die$.,$/
hobbs
  • 223,387
  • 19
  • 210
  • 288
  • That's a neat trick! Can you explain how you did it? This is actually the first code golf I've ever tried and I'm not familiar with all the tricky stuff you can do in Perl. – Vivin Paliath Apr 14 '10 at 02:22
  • It's abusing the magic thing the `++` operator does on strings -- see `perldoc perlop` and search "little extra builtin magic". I'll write a more thorough explanation after I take care of some business at work. – hobbs Apr 14 '10 at 02:30
2

JavaScript, 93 characters

with(prompt())for(l=length,i=0,v=i--;++i<l;)v+=(charCodeAt(l-1-i)-64)*Math.pow(26,i);alert(v)
2

Lua, 61 characters

x=0 for c in(...):gfind(".")do x=x*26-64+c:byte()end print(x)
Community
  • 1
  • 1
gwell
  • 2,695
  • 20
  • 20
2

wazoox:

echo -n WTF | perl -ple '$=()=A..$'

This prints a new line so the answer is more readable on the shell.

sabujp
  • 989
  • 1
  • 11
  • 12
2

Smalltalk, 72

Smalltalk arguments first reverse inject:0into:[:o :e|o*26+e digitValue]
Paolo Bonzini
  • 1,900
  • 15
  • 25
2

PHP: 56 55 characters

for($i='a';$i++!=strtolower($argv[1]);@$c++){}echo++$c;

PHP: 44 43 characters only for uppercase letters

for($i='A';$i++!=$argv[1];@$c++){}echo++$c;

chebur
  • 614
  • 8
  • 16
2

Applescript: 188
Here's the requisite applescript in 188 characters, which is a very difficult language to make non-verbose. It also happens to be the longest answer of any language so far. If anyone knows how to shorten it, do share.

on run s  
 set {o, c} to {0, 0}  
 repeat with i in reverse of (s's item 1)'s characters  
  set m to 26 ^ c as integer  
  set c to c + 1  
  set o to o + ((ASCII number of i) - 64) * m  
 end repeat  
end run

Usage:
osascript /path/to/script.scpt ROFL

user1330493
  • 61
  • 1
  • 2
2

PHP, 38 chars

for($a=A;++$c,$a++!=$argv[1];);echo$c;

usage, e.g.

php -r 'for($a=A;++$c,$a++!=$argv[1];);echo$c;' WTF
1

Python

import string

letters = string.uppercase
colnum = lambda s: sum((letters.index(let)+1)*26**idx for idx, let in enumerate(s[::-1]))

print colnum('WTF') 
# 16074
print colnum('ROFL')
# 326676
ars
  • 120,335
  • 23
  • 147
  • 134
1

Java, 164 characters

public class A{public static void main(String[] z){int o=0,c=0;for(int i=z[0].length()-1;i>=0;i--,c++)o+=(z[0].charAt(i)-64)*Math.pow(26,c);System.out.println(o);}}

Java, 177 characters

public class A
{
public static void main(String[] z)
{
    int m,o=0,c=0;
    for(int i=z[0].length()-1;i>=0;i--,c++)
    {
        m=(int)Math.pow(26,c);
        o+=(z[0].charAt(i)-64)*m;
    }
    System.out.println(o);
}
}

Assumes an uppercase input (via command line argument). The obvious approach with no tricks.

dogbane
  • 266,786
  • 75
  • 396
  • 414
Ross
  • 1,553
  • 1
  • 14
  • 22
1

dc - 20 chars

(does the opposite)

dc can't handle character input, so I coded the opposite: input the column number and output the column name:

?[26~64+rd0<LP]dsLxP
dc exccol.dc
326676
 ROFL
Community
  • 1
  • 1
Carlos Gutiérrez
  • 13,972
  • 5
  • 37
  • 47
1

My Javascript solution is just 82 characters long and uses Integer.parseInt with Radix 36. It'd be fine if somebody could appen this to the Javascript section of this thread! :-)

a=function(b){t=0;b.split('').map(function(n){t=parseInt(n,36)-9+t*26});return t};
bflesch
  • 583
  • 4
  • 6
1

PHP:

<?$t=0;$s=str_split($argv[1]);$z=count($s);foreach($s as$v){$z--;$t+=(ord($v)-64)*pow(26,$z);}echo$t?>

usage: php filename.php ROFL

outputs: 326676

1

Python (47 chars)

reduce(lambda a,b:a*26+ord(b)-64,raw_input(),0)

works only on uppercase letters

amashi
  • 103
  • 6
1

Matlab 38 chars


Works only with uppercase letters. Not sure if it has to work with lowercase too (none in example).

x=input('')'-64;26.^(size(x)-1:-1:0)*x

If new lines do not count only 37 (omitting semicolon):

x=input('')'-64
26.^(size(x)-1:-1:0)*x

I see Matlab beats a lot of languages. Who would expect that.

Example:

Input: 'ROFL' (dont forget the '' )
Output: ans = 326676
George
  • 3,765
  • 21
  • 25
1

Factor: 47 characters

reverse [ 26 swap ^ swap 64 - * ] map-index sum

1

Prolog: 49 chars

c([],A,A).
c([H|T],I,R):-J is H-64+I*26,c(T,J,R).

Using the above code:

| ?- c("WTF",0,R).
R = 16074 ? 
yes
| ?- c("ROFL",0,R).
R = 326676 ? 
yes
Michael
  • 121
  • 1
1

php 29 chars:


while($i++!=$t)$c++;echo$c+1;
  • assuming register_globals=On
  • assuming error_reporting=0
  • call via webserver ?i=A&t=ABC
elias
  • 1,481
  • 7
  • 13
1

Python: 88 characters

using list comprehensions:

s=input()
print sum([((26**(len(s)-i-1))*(ord(s[i])-64)) for i in range(len(s))])
thepandaatemyface
  • 5,034
  • 6
  • 25
  • 30
1

Josl in 48 characters

main 0 0 argv each 64 - swap 26 * + next print

Examples:

$ josl numequiv.j A
1
$ josl numequiv.j ABC
731
$ josl numequiv.j ROFL
326676

Reading from standard input:

main 0 STDIN read-line each 64 - swap 26 * + next print
jeremy
  • 130
  • 1
  • 7
1

OOBasic: 178 characters, not counting indentational whitespace

revised

This version passes all the test cases. I suspect that it would be more successfully golf if it didn't "take advantage" of the fact that there's a spreadsheet using this numbering system. See the notes on the original version below for info on why that's not particularly useful. I didn't try very hard to cut down the score.

Also note that this will only work when run as a macro from an OO calc spreadsheet, for obvious reasons.

Function C(st as String) as Long
    C = 0
    while len(st)
        C = C*26 + ThisComponent.Sheets(0).getCellRangeByName(left(st,1) &"1").CellAddress.Column+1
        st = mid(st,2)
    wend
End Function

original

OOBasic (OpenOffice Basic), too many characters (124):

Function C(co As String) As Long 
    C = ThisComponent.Sheets(0).getCellRangeByName(co &"1").CellAddress.Column+1
End Function

Limitations:

  • maximum value of co is AMJ (1024 columns). Anything larger results in an error with a completely uninformative error message.
    • This limitation is also present for the COLUMN() cell function. Presumably this is the maximum number of columns in an OOCalc spreadsheet; I didn't bother scrolling over that far or googling to find out.

Notes:

  • strangely it's not possible to give the variable 'co' a 1-letter name. Not sure what the logic is behind this, but after having spent enough time using OOBasic you stop looking for logic and begin to blindly accept the way things are (perhaps from gazing too long at the Sun).

Anyway entering =C("A"), =C("ABC"), etc. in a cell works for the first four test cases; the last two give errors.

intuited
  • 23,174
  • 7
  • 66
  • 88
1

straight bash

filter: 97 chars

{ read c;i=0;while [ $c ];do eval s=({A..${c:0:1}});i=$((i*26+${#s[@]}));c=${c:1};done;echo $i;}

Usage:

echo ROFL | { read c;i=0;while [ $c ];do eval s=({A..${c:0:1}});i=$((i*26+${#s[@]}));c=${c:1};done;echo $i;}
326676

function: 98 chars

C(){ i=0;while [ $1 ];do eval s=({A..${1:0:1}});i=$((i*26+${#s[@]}));set -- ${1:1};done;echo $i;}

Usage:

C ROFL
326676

Explanation of the filter version:

read c;i=0;

Initialize the column and the total.

while [ $c ];do

while there are still column characters left

eval s=({A..${c:0:1}});

${c:0:1} returns the first character of the column; s=({A..Z}) makes s an array containing the letters from A to Z

i=$((i*26+${#s[@]}));

$((...)) wraps an arithmetic evaluation; ${#s[@]} is the number of elements in the array $s

c=${c:1};done;

${c:1} is the characters in $c after the first. done ends the while loop

echo $i

um i forget

better but dubious

Removing the 5 characters "echo " will result in the output for an input of "ROFL" being

326676: command not found

Also the i=0 is probably not necessary if you're sure that you don't have that variable set in your current shell.

intuited
  • 23,174
  • 7
  • 66
  • 88
1

F# (37 chars):

Seq.fold (fun n c -> int c-64+26*n) 0
J D
  • 48,105
  • 13
  • 171
  • 274
1

K 3.2 (13 characters)

26_sv -64+_ic

Usage:

  26_sv -64+_ic"ROFL"
326676

Explanation:

  • As mentioned above K evaluates from right to left, so the _ic function takes whatever is to its right and converts it to an integer value, this includes both single characters and character vectors
  • -64 is added to each item in the integer vector that to get a set of base values
  • _sv takes two arguments: the one on its left is the numeric base, 26, and the one on its right is the integer vector of offset values
afshin
  • 204
  • 1
  • 4
1

Excel VBA, 19 characters:

range("WTF").Column

iDevlop
  • 24,841
  • 11
  • 90
  • 149
1

Ruby solution in 26 chars

p ("A"..$*[0]).to_a.size

Gerhard
  • 6,850
  • 8
  • 51
  • 81
0

Real VBA, 216 w/o spaces

I fail at real golf too.

Private Sub CB1_Click()
Dim C, S
Range("A1").Select
Do
S = Len(ActiveCell)
x = 0
C = 0
Do
C = (Asc(Mid(ActiveCell, (S - x), 1)) - 64) * (26 ^ x) + C
x = x + 1
Loop Until x = S
ActiveCell.Offset(0, 1) = C
ActiveCell.Offset(1, 0).Activate
Loop Until ActiveCell = ""
End Sub

Uses Column A for input, outputs to Column B, runs off a VB command button click. =D

0

Elang, 53/78

Shell, 53 characters:

F=fun(S)->lists:foldl(fun(C,A)->A*26+C-64end,0,S)end.

Module, 78 characters:

-module(g).
-export([f/1]).
f(S)->lists:foldl(fun(C,A)->A*26+C-64end,0,S).
0

F# 92 chars :)


let e2n (c : string) = c |> Seq.map (fun x -> (int)x - 64) |> Seq.reduce(fun e a -> a*26+e)

0

Groovy: 51 Characters

char[] a=args[0];t=0;for(i in a)t=26*t+i-64;print t

Invoke as

groovy *scriptname* ROFL

or

groovy -e "char[] a=args[0];t=0;for(i in a)t=26*t+i-64;print t" ROFL

This essentially the same as Java. I imagine some possibilities with using ranges and closures, but nothing came to mind for this example. Anyone else see a way to shorten this?

A more groovy-looking version with a closure is a bit longer, unfortunately.

t=0;args[0].toCharArray().each{t=t*26+it-64};print t
DaveG
  • 301
  • 1
  • 3
0

Go: 106 characters

It's not the shortest of all the languages. But it can be the shortest of C, C++, Java, and C#.

package main
import("os"
"fmt")
func main(){t:=0
for _,c := range os.Args[1]{t=t*26+c-64}
fmt.Println(t)}

Formated version:

package main

import (
    "os"
    "fmt"
)

func main() {
    t := 0
    for _, c := range os.Args[1] {
        t = t*26 + c - 64
    }   
    fmt.Println(t)
}
Stephen Hsu
  • 5,127
  • 7
  • 31
  • 39
-1

Excel - 99 characters

Enter as array formula - I am not counting Excel adding { }

=SUM((CODE(MID(A1,ROW(INDIRECT("1:" & LEN(A1))),1))-64)*26^(LEN(A1)-ROW(INDIRECT("1:" & LEN(A1)))))

Siddharth Rout
  • 147,039
  • 17
  • 206
  • 250
RonnieDickson
  • 1,400
  • 10
  • 9
-4

how about a new language
with operators defined as

# - will return the =COLUMN() of EXCEL as a stringised number

, - read in a string

. - write out a string

then the program to do that is

,#.

alvin
  • 1,176
  • 8
  • 15
  • 9
    I hope future code golfs create a rule saying **The language must be Turing complete** to stop these rotten jokes. – kennytm Apr 16 '10 at 13:45
  • Simple. Define an extension of HQ9+B (which itself is a Turing-complete extension of HQ9+) that has three new operators... – Jouni K. Seppänen Apr 16 '10 at 14:15
  • 8
    The actual solution is to get chip manufacturers to implement a machine instruction for these problems. – Jonno_FTW Apr 16 '10 at 17:18
  • @Kenny: just another perspective in the spirit of ioccc :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Obfuscated_C_Code_Contest#Rules – alvin Apr 17 '10 at 16:53
  • even each package/library used implies a meta-linguistic abstraction. so if i wrote a package to solve this problem with one api call, and accidentally that package got included into the standard library :) of any one the turing complete languages, i would be able to solve the problem in just one api call. will it then be counted as a valid answer. so atleast the language should be constrained to the plain base language, without using any libraries. some of the answers use the math or the string libraries. should'nt the source code size of those calls be counted in too? – alvin Apr 17 '10 at 17:06
  • 1
    This won't work, due to Excel's column count limitations. In fact this problem cannot be solved in your new language. – intuited Apr 18 '10 at 03:38
  • @intuited. that is interesting. – alvin Apr 18 '10 at 06:22
  • @alvin: now if you add in a function to convert veganhexisimula [sp!] into decimal, well then you're rockin. But it's still making up the rules as you go, and the rules are "I win." – intuited Apr 18 '10 at 07:38