Does java have a built-in method to compare precedence of two operators? For example, if I have a char '/' and a char '+' is there a method I can call that compares the two and returns true/false if the first is greater than the second (e.g. true)?
4 Answers
Operator precedence the way you defined it, while common, is not a universal truth that the Java language should recognize. Therefore no, Java language itself does not have such comparison. It is of course easy to write your own:
int precedenceLevel(char op) {
switch (op) {
case '+':
case '-':
return 0;
case '*':
case '/':
return 1;
case '^':
return 2;
default:
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Operator unknown: " + op);
}
}
Then given char op1, op2
, just compare precedenceLevel(op1), precedenceLevel(op2)
.
You can also use if-else
, or ternary operators instead of switch
if you only have very few operators. Another option would be to use an enum Operator implements Comparable<Operator>
, but depending on what you're doing, perhaps a parsing tool like ANTLR is the better.
Note that the above example puts ^
at the highest precedence, implying that perhaps it's used to denote exponentiation. In fact, ^
in Java language is the exclusive-or, and it has a lower precedence than +
.
System.out.println(1+2^3); // prints 0
System.out.println(1+(2^3)); // prints 2
System.out.println((1+2)^3); // prints 0
This just goes to show that the precedence and even semantics of these symbols are NOT universal truths.
See also:

- 1
- 1

- 376,812
- 128
- 561
- 623
no. your best bet is to find a 3rdparty jar that does language parsing, and see if they have methods such as that.

- 28,272
- 7
- 61
- 66
You can write you own API, which performs this and Send this as a parameter and gives you the result.

- 15,598
- 27
- 89
- 112
I am puzzled why you think you need this information at run-time. In every language I have ever used including algebra and English, operator precedence is predefined.

- 305,947
- 44
- 307
- 483
-
Hi- I know this is very old but I haven't logged in recently. The question was for a school assignment involving a prefix to postfix converter. Since the prefix expression is provided by the user, then the order of operations needed to be defined in a function so operations in the user-provided prefix could be evaluated at runtime. – Andrew Keller Jun 24 '10 at 03:55
-
That doesn't make sense. Unless the operator precedence is defined by the user, it can be hardcoded into the structure of the program. – user207421 Jun 25 '10 at 00:23