My preferred answer would be "don't do this" but failing that, and because it's interesting, here's a proof of concept, assisted by this question and mostly adapted from this blog post:
app.directive('myRepeat', function(){
return {
transclude : 'element',
compile : function(element, attrs, linker){
return function($scope, $element, $attr){
var collectionExpr = attrs.myRepeat;
var parent = $element.parent();
var elements = [];
// $watchCollection is called everytime the collection is modified
$scope.$watchCollection(collectionExpr, function(collection) {
var i, block, childScope;
// check if elements have already been rendered
if(elements.length > 0){
// if so remove them from DOM, and destroy their scope
for (i = 0; i < elements.length; i++) {
elements[i].el.remove();
elements[i].scope.$destroy();
};
elements = [];
}
for (i = 0; i < collection.length; i++) {
// create a new scope for every element in the collection.
childScope = $scope.$new();
// ***
// This is the bit that makes it behave like a `with`
// statement -- we assign the item's attributes to the
// child scope one by one, rather than simply adding
// the item itself.
angular.forEach(collection[i], function(v, k) {
childScope[k] = v;
});
// ***
linker(childScope, function(clone){
// clone the transcluded element, passing in the new scope.
parent.append(clone); // add to DOM
block = {};
block.el = clone;
block.scope = childScope;
elements.push(block);
});
};
});
}
}
}
});
And then this will do what you want:
app.controller("myController", function($scope, $http) {
$scope.items = [
{a: 123, b: 234},
{a: 321, b: 432}
];
});
With the HTML structure you want:
<div ng-controller="myController">
<ul>
<li my-repeat="items">
{{ a }} {{ b }}
</li>
</ul>
</div>
Notice that given the attributes are copied into the child scopes, rather than referenced, if changes are made to the view, they won't affect the model (ie. the parent items
list), severely limiting the usefulness of this directive. You could hack around this with an extra scope.$watch
but it'd almost certainly be less fuss to use ng-repeat
as it's normally used.