That's a somewhat overly nested JSON. But if that's what you have to work with, and assuming your parsed JSON is in jdata
:
datapts = jdata['data']
rownames = ['actual', 'upper_end_of_central_tendency']
colnames = [ item['title'] for item in datapts ] + ['schedule_id' ]
sched_id = jdata['schedule_id']
rows = [ [item['data'][rn] for item in datapts ] + [sched_id] for rn in rownames]
df = pd.DataFrame(rows, index=rownames, columns=colnames)
df
is now:

If you wanted to simplify that a bit, you could construct the core data without the asymmetric schedule_id
field, then add that after the fact:
datapts = jdata['data']
rownames = ['actual', 'upper_end_of_central_tendency']
colnames = [ item['title'] for item in datapts ]
rows = [ [item['data'][rn] for item in datapts ] for rn in rownames]
d2 = pd.DataFrame(rows, index=rownames, columns=colnames)
d2['schedule_id'] = jdata['schedule_id']
That will make an identical DataFrame (i.e. df == d2
). It helps when learning pandas to try a few different construction strategies, and get a feel for what is more straightforward. There are more powerful tools for unfolding nested structures into flatter tables, but they're not as easy to understand first time out of the gate.
(Update) If you wanted a better structuring on your JSON to make it easier to put into this format, ask pandas what it likes. E.g. df.to_json()
output, slightly prettified:
{
"2009": {
"actual": "(0.2)",
"upper_end_of_central_tendency": "-"
},
"2010": {
"actual": "2.8",
"upper_end_of_central_tendency": "-"
},
"longer_run": {
"actual": "-",
"upper_end_of_central_tendency": "2.3"
},
"schedule_id": {
"actual": "2014-03-19",
"upper_end_of_central_tendency": "2014-03-19"
}
}
That is a format from which pandas' read_json
function will immediately construct the DataFrame
you desire.