4

I was wondering if there is any way to force people to use git-flow and let them push only if they are working under the git-flow patter? just to avoid developers to push directly to the master branch. I am using bitbucket (if it helps).

wonea
  • 4,783
  • 17
  • 86
  • 139
jpganz18
  • 5,508
  • 17
  • 66
  • 115
  • possible duplicate of [Disable push to specific branches on GitHub](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18520618/disable-push-to-specific-branches-on-github) – Michael Durrant Apr 16 '15 at 11:01
  • @MichaelDurrant this question seems to be about BitBucket specifically, so it's not a duplicate. – Max Yankov Apr 19 '15 at 07:59
  • @jpganz18 it would be a different question, depending on whether you want the answer for BitBucket or for a self-hosted git server: an answer that would be valid for a self-hosted git most likely wouldn't help a BitBacket user at all. – Max Yankov Apr 19 '15 at 08:01
  • 6
    I don't use bitbucket but would this https://blog.bitbucket.org/2013/09/16/take-control-with-branch-restrictions/ resolve your issue? – RyanMacG Apr 19 '15 at 08:05
  • @RyanMacG that seemed to be a perfectly good answer (upvoted). Don't understand why you switched it to a comment instead – Max Yankov Apr 19 '15 at 08:11
  • 2
    I was told link only answers are frowned upon so I changed it since I had no real information to add from myself – RyanMacG Apr 19 '15 at 08:12

0 Answers0