What is the rationale for:
mov eax, 1.5
not working with:
expression syntax error
and requiring you to do:
mov eax, __float32__(1.5)
instead? The fact that it works for the dd
family:
dd 1.5
makes me even more curious.
Would there be a syntax ambiguity with some other language feature in that case?
Couldn't the size just be inferred from the register size as when we do:
mov eax, 1
I have also posted on their bugtracker, but no reply so far: http://bugzilla.nasm.us/show_bug.cgi?id=3392309