I used to think that the only layout engine supports @page is PrinceXML, but recently I detected this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@page
Try to print this demo page in different browsers and PrinceXML.
Do I miss something?
Asked
Active
Viewed 116 times
2
-
3the demo page link you posted is dead – Miguel Mota May 02 '15 at 09:00
-
I'm sorry, it's working now. – Anas R. May 30 '15 at 11:27
-
in chrome it looks like it's working.. – maioman May 30 '15 at 11:33
-
So what is the question? The doc you refer to say it's support in almost every browser in use today. Do you have any reason to doubt that, any particular problems? Or should we analyze the CSS and deduce a question ourselves? :o) – GolezTrol May 30 '15 at 11:33
-
PrinceXML's output shows headers and footers defined by the attached CSS file, Chrome and Firefox don't. – Anas R. May 30 '15 at 11:43
1 Answers
0
There was a long period in which Prince was way ahead of browsers in support of @page rules and other things that are generally useful for book generation, printing, etc. I do not believe browsers yet have good support for things like offset printing, archival PDF format selection, and lots of other features that are suited to print/book creation, but they are way closer than they used to be.
Joel Meador
- 2,586
- 2
- 19
- 24