I have on a website facebook style notification in top right corner. I show there up to 5 latest notifications. I do initial pulling with child_added
and also after same firebaseRef
child_added
listening for new notifications.
Now I'd like to play a sound on new notification and a little number of new notifications.
The only thing I can't figure is how to distinguish when was a new notification and when was it already seen, a.k.a page reload? Is there any other approach than making some new property read
?
I was looking around and found some old answers from 2012 with suggestions limitToLast(1) which doesn't help in my case.
EDIT:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/27693310/633154 This @Kato answers recommends to listen only to new notifications which time is more than current Firebase time Firebase.ServerValue.TIMESTAMP
. This seems the way to go, but I am creating a new notification with REST API and myself setting timestamp as my server's UTC. So there may be some minor inconsistencies. Shouldn't be a big deal
EDIT 2:
With this query, I'm getting correctly up to 5 last notifications on page load and no new notifications are coming afterwards
notifRef.limitToLast(5).once("value", function(snapshot) {
snapshot.forEach(function(data) {
addNotifications(data.val());
});
});
In the above linked other SO thread @Kato's answer doesn't work, notifRef.orderBy is not a function
.
I have tried multiple other versions according to doc
https://www.firebase.com/docs/web/guide/retrieving-data.html#section-queries
My structure is same
{
"messages": {
"$messageid": { // firebase generated key 'JqcEWLFJrl1eaed5naN'
"sender": "kato",
"message": "hello world"
"timestamp": 1433036536108 // Firebase.ServerValue.TIMESTAMP
}
}
}
Here is what i tried to do and errors I'm getting:
var queryRef = notifRef.orderByKey().startAt(Firebase.ServerValue.TIMESTAMP);
Error:Query: When ordering by key, the argument passed to startAt(), endAt(),or equalTo() must be a string.
var queryRef = notifRef.orderByChild('timestamp').startAt(Firebase.ServerValue.TIMESTAMP);
Error: Query: First argument passed to startAt(), endAt(), or equalTo() cannot be an object.
In the documentation I have not seen that to startAt anything but the element position is passed (integer) but not a firebase timestamp object, that's why such error.
Only below compiles, just having startAt without ordering, but it's not shooting any new notifications!
var queryRef = notifRef.startAt(Firebase.ServerValue.TIMESTAMP);
queryRef.on('child_added', function(snap) {
console.log(snap.val());
addNotifications(snap.val());
// TODO clean up if more than 5 notifications
});
Any idea where could be the problem? What is the correct way to listen only to newer notifications than current timestamp?
EDIT 3
Here is my final solution
notifRef.limitToLast(5).once("value", function(snapshot) {
var lastKey = null; // at least 1 key is always present
var count = 0; // because startAt is inclusive, we have to ignore first child_added
snapshot.forEach(function(data) {
addNotifications(data.val());
lastKey = data.key();
});
checkNotifications();
notifRef.orderByKey().startAt(lastKey).on('child_added', function(snap) {
if (count > 0) {
console.log(snap.val());
addNotifications(snap.val());
// TODO clean up if more than 5 notifications
checkNotifications();
}
count++;
});
});
I don't trust browser time, so had to go first by querying last 5 existing keys, and after that passing to startAt
the last key I received. notifRef.orderByKey().startAt(lastKey)
can't be outside notifRef.limitToLast(5).once("value"
because according to doc, once
is queried last so the lastKey
js variable passed to startAt
would be always null.
Also need to have the count
variable, because startAt
is taking inclusive, but because it was already there, I need to ignore the first one.
Also with this solution when there are more than 5 notifications, I query my backend with checkNotifications
only once at the end when notifications are received with once
query. Otherwise on child_added
it would do up to 5 times on every page load.
If there is anything that could be optimized, please tell