I have a directive defined like this:
app.directive('itemComments', ['ajax', function(ajax) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
templateUrl: URL + 'public/Pages/Homepage/ajax/getCommentsTpl',
controller: 'ItemLibraryController',
controllerAs: 'itemLibraryCtrl',
link: function(scope, element, attr) {
var $element = $(element);
scope.$watch(function(scope) {
return $element.find('li').length > 0;
}, function(finished) {
if(finished) {
autosize($element.find('textarea'));
}
});
}
};
}]);
The template specified by "templateUrl"
returns something like this:
...
<textarea class="form-control textarea-resize" ng-keyup="commentPost($event)" ng-model="textComment"></textarea>
...
In ItemLibraryController I have defined the method commentPost() that is accessed on keyup on textarea.
The problem is that $scope.textComment = undefined
instead of the value entered in textarea. If i modify in html ng-model="$parent.textComment"
then the value from the textarea is found in $scope.textComment
.
PS. When using "template" instead of "templateUrl" in the directive definition, the ng-model problem disappears.
My questions are:
Why do i have to use $parent.textComment since the scope of the template is the ItemLibraryController?
Why using templateUrl creates another scope for the ng-models inside the template?
Why, when using "template" instead of "templateUrl" in directive definition, the ng-model problem disappears?
How can i access textComment without using $parent.textComment?