33

I want to select the last 5 records from a table in SQL Server without arranging the table in ascending or descending order.

Mitch Wheat
  • 295,962
  • 43
  • 465
  • 541
  • 4
    @Ganesh - you should phrase your question as a real question, not as a statement "I need help". – paxdiablo Nov 22 '08 at 08:04
  • It is important to understand that the sequence of records in a result of _any_ query that does not use explicit sorting via `ORDER BY` will be _non-deterministic_. If there is no sort, then there is no definition of _last_. – Chris Schaller Sep 07 '22 at 00:16
  • @Chris Schaller -- Then why does TOP (5) work? I don't understand why TOP (5) gets the top 5 without ORDER BY but there is no BOTTOM(5) OR LAST(5) that I can find. Given that TOP (5) exists, it is logical to expect something that does the opposite. Perhaps the answer is that TOP (5) starts an unlimited query that is interrupted after 5 records are returned, calling these the top or first. To get bottom one would have to get everything, then truncate the table to only give the last 5 received. As Matt Hamilton does. ??? – Blaine Kelley Nov 03 '22 at 13:32
  • @BlaineKelley having a `bottom5` is about as logical as burning a witch at the stake to prove innocence. a `BOTTOM(X)` would require processing all rows in the table and discarding them except for the last `X` records. It would be the most inefficient query in the entire SQL stack. If you don't want to order, then this indicates that your structure is not sufficient. If you have an auto-incrementing column then you can order by that column in descending order to get the top 5, whilst still preserving the data input sequence, this will be the bottom 5. – Chris Schaller Nov 03 '22 at 13:43
  • You should **NEVER** call `TOP (X)` without a corresponding `ORDER BY` clause, in many RDBMS the sequence will be indeterminate and is volatile, the database engine can re-sequence the reocrds to optimise the queries, this can mean that `TOP (5)` today can return different records to `TOP(5)` yesterday. Don't be lazy, be explicit and make sure you design your schemas to support practical sequencing. _SQL 101_ – Chris Schaller Nov 03 '22 at 13:46

22 Answers22

37

This is just about the most bizarre query I've ever written, but I'm pretty sure it gets the "last 5" rows from a table without ordering:

select * 
from issues
where issueid not in (
    select top (
        (select count(*) from issues) - 5
    ) issueid
    from issues
)

Note that this makes use of SQL Server 2005's ability to pass a value into the "top" clause - it doesn't work on SQL Server 2000.

Matt Hamilton
  • 200,371
  • 61
  • 386
  • 320
33

Suppose you have an index on id, this will be lightning fast:

SELECT * FROM [MyTable] WHERE [id] > (SELECT MAX([id]) - 5 FROM [MyTable])
msuvajac
  • 652
  • 5
  • 5
  • 10
    This is only safe if you haven't deleted any records. ie. if your max id = 100, but you deleted record 99, you'll only end up with 4 records, not 5. – Amber Dec 18 '15 at 00:24
  • Perhaps using `COUNT(1)` rather than `MAX(id)` will be better. – matty Aug 12 '22 at 17:39
13

The way your question is phrased makes it sound like you think you have to physically resort the data in the table in order to get it back in the order you want. If so, this is not the case, the ORDER BY clause exists for this purpose. The physical order in which the records are stored remains unchanged when using ORDER BY. The records are sorted in memory (or in temporary disk space) before they are returned.

Note that the order that records get returned is not guaranteed without using an ORDER BY clause. So, while any of the the suggestions here may work, there is no reason to think they will continue to work, nor can you prove that they work in all cases with your current database. This is by design - I am assuming it is to give the database engine the freedom do as it will with the records in order to obtain best performance in the case where there is no explicit order specified.

Assuming you wanted the last 5 records sorted by the field Name in ascending order, you could do something like this, which should work in either SQL 2000 or 2005:

select Name 
from (
    select top 5 Name 
    from MyTable 
    order by Name desc
) a 
order by Name asc
D'Arcy Rittich
  • 167,292
  • 40
  • 290
  • 283
  • 1
    This should be marked as the correct answer (and most compatible). – AshesToAshes May 11 '16 at 16:08
  • Data in tables is not always in the organised format... the idea behind the question is , what to do if we want to know the last entry in such a database – snigdha Mar 26 '20 at 12:21
  • @snigdha The answer above is trying to tell you that "last" is a concept that does not exist in SQL without ORDER BY. – D'Arcy Rittich Mar 26 '20 at 16:35
10
  1. You need to count number of rows inside table ( say we have 12 rows )
  2. then subtract 5 rows from them ( we are now in 7 )
  3. select * where index_column > 7

    select * from users
    where user_id > 
    ( (select COUNT(*) from users) - 5)
    

    you can order them ASC or DESC

    But when using this code

    select TOP 5 from users order by user_id DESC
    

    it will not be ordered easily.

M.M.F
  • 109
  • 1
  • 4
5
select * from table limit 5 offset (select count(*) from table) - 5;
Rob
  • 333
  • 2
  • 9
4

Search 5 records from last records you can use this,

SELECT *
FROM   Table Name
WHERE  ID <= IDENT_CURRENT('Table Name')
AND ID >= IDENT_CURRENT('Table Name') - 5
udondan
  • 57,263
  • 20
  • 190
  • 175
4

Without an order, this is impossible. What defines the "bottom"? The following will select 5 rows according to how they are stored in the database.

SELECT TOP 5 * FROM [TableName]

Stefan Mai
  • 23,367
  • 6
  • 55
  • 61
  • Right, also you can add an "order by colx desc" to bottom 5 depending on the indexes. ie. the top 5 *ARE* the bottom 5 if you reverse the order. – Booji Boy Nov 22 '08 at 16:27
  • This is not correct. This query will select 5 rows **but not (always)** according to how they are stored in the database. – ypercubeᵀᴹ Sep 28 '12 at 06:21
4

Well, the "last five rows" are actually the last five rows depending on your clustered index. Your clustered index, by definition, is the way that he rows are ordered. So you really can't get the "last five rows" without some order. You can, however, get the last five rows as it pertains to the clustered index.

SELECT TOP 5 * FROM MyTable
ORDER BY MyCLusteredIndexColumn1, MyCLusteredIndexColumnq, ..., MyCLusteredIndexColumnN DESC
Charles Graham
  • 24,293
  • 14
  • 43
  • 56
2

In SQL Server 2012 you can do this :

Declare @Count1 int ;

Select @Count1 = Count(*)
FROM    [Log] AS L

SELECT  
   *
FROM    [Log] AS L
ORDER BY L.id
OFFSET @Count - 5 ROWS
FETCH NEXT 5 ROWS ONLY;
Ardalan Shahgholi
  • 11,967
  • 21
  • 108
  • 144
2

If you know how many rows there will be in total you can use the ROW_NUMBER() function. Here's an examble from MSDN (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms186734.aspx)

USE AdventureWorks;
GO
WITH OrderedOrders AS
(
    SELECT SalesOrderID, OrderDate,
    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY OrderDate) AS 'RowNumber'
    FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader 
) 
SELECT * 
FROM OrderedOrders 
WHERE RowNumber BETWEEN 50 AND 60;
idstam
  • 2,848
  • 1
  • 21
  • 30
2

Try this, if you don't have a primary key or identical column:

select [Stu_Id],[Student_Name] ,[City] ,[Registered], 
       RowNum = row_number() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT 0))    
from student
ORDER BY RowNum desc 
Paul Roub
  • 36,322
  • 27
  • 84
  • 93
Apps Tawale
  • 665
  • 7
  • 7
  • Thanks, If we have an identity_column then it was an easy job.. But I had a `View` ..So this is what I was looking for.. ! – Irf Jun 14 '18 at 07:49
  • added a [slightly modified](https://stackoverflow.com/a/50853704/1042705) version – Irf Jun 14 '18 at 09:14
1

Last 5 rows retrieve in mysql


This query working perfectly

SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM recharge ORDER BY sno DESC LIMIT 5)sub ORDER BY sno ASC

or

select sno from(select sno from recharge order by sno desc limit 5) as t where t.sno order by t.sno asc
Baby Groot
  • 4,637
  • 39
  • 52
  • 71
M Palani Mca
  • 159
  • 1
  • 3
1

When number of rows in table is less than 5 the answers of Matt Hamilton and msuvajac is Incorrect. Because a TOP N rowcount value may not be negative.
A great example can be found Here.

Ali Sohrabi
  • 134
  • 2
  • 12
1

i am using this code:

select * from tweets where placeID = '$placeID' and id > (
    (select count(*) from tweets where placeID = '$placeID')-2)
Manuel Allenspach
  • 12,467
  • 14
  • 54
  • 76
1
select * 
from table 
order by empno(primary key) desc 
fetch first 5 rows only
Martin Smith
  • 438,706
  • 87
  • 741
  • 845
1

You can retrieve them from memory.
So first you get the rows in a DataSet, and then get the last 5 out of the DataSet.

eddy147
  • 4,853
  • 8
  • 38
  • 57
1

There is a handy trick that works in some databases for ordering in database order,

SELECT * FROM TableName ORDER BY true

Apparently, this can work in conjunction with any of the other suggestions posted here to leave the results in "order they came out of the database" order, which in some databases, is the order they were last modified in.

Kent Fredric
  • 56,416
  • 14
  • 107
  • 150
1

In SQL Server, it does not seem possible without using ordering in the query. This is what I have used.

SELECT *
FROM
(
    SELECT TOP 5 *
    FROM [MyTable]
    ORDER BY Id DESC /*Primary Key*/
) AS T
ORDER BY T.Id ASC; /*Primary Key*/
Rahul Mahadik
  • 794
  • 11
  • 19
0
DECLARE @MYVAR  NVARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @step  int
SET @step = 0;


DECLARE MYTESTCURSOR CURSOR
DYNAMIC 
FOR
SELECT col FROM [dbo].[table]
OPEN MYTESTCURSOR
FETCH LAST FROM MYTESTCURSOR INTO @MYVAR
print @MYVAR;


WHILE @step < 10
BEGIN   
    FETCH PRIOR FROM MYTESTCURSOR INTO @MYVAR
        print @MYVAR;
        SET @step = @step + 1;
END   
CLOSE MYTESTCURSOR
DEALLOCATE MYTESTCURSOR
Slava
  • 3,445
  • 1
  • 20
  • 16
0

Thanks to @Apps Tawale , Based on his answer, here's a bit of another (my) version,

To select last 5 records without an identity column,

select top 5 *, 
   RowNum = row_number() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT 0))    
from  [dbo].[ViewEmployeeMaster]
ORDER BY RowNum desc

Nevertheless, it has an order by, but on RowNum :)

Note(1): The above query will reverse the order of what we get when we run the main select query.

So to maintain the order, we can slightly go like:

select *, RowNum2 = row_number() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT 0))    
from ( 
        select top 5 *, RowNum = row_number() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT 0))    
        from  [dbo].[ViewEmployeeMaster]
        ORDER BY RowNum desc
     ) as t1
order by RowNum2 desc

Note(2): Without an identity column, the query takes a bit of time in case of large data

Irf
  • 4,285
  • 3
  • 36
  • 49
-1

Get the count of that table

select count(*) from TABLE
select top count * from TABLE where 'primary key row' NOT IN (select top (count-5) 'primary key row' from TABLE)
Nolen Royalty
  • 18,415
  • 4
  • 40
  • 50
Balaji
  • 1
-2

If you do not want to arrange the table in ascending or descending order. Use this.

select * from table limit 5 offset (select count(*) from table) - 5;
Hervera
  • 584
  • 9
  • 17