2

Is there a way to get standard errors for the coef.merMod method of the lme4 package, or is it nonsense to compute SE for the coefficients?

Example:

library(lme4)
fit <- lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (Days | Subject), sleepstudy)
coef(fit)

$Subject
    (Intercept)       Days
308    253.6637 19.6662579
309    211.0065  1.8475828
310    212.4449  5.0184061
330    275.0956  5.6529547
331    273.6653  7.3973914
332    260.4446 10.1951153
333    268.2455 10.2436615
334    244.1725 11.5418620
335    251.0714 -0.2848731
337    286.2955 19.0955699
349    226.1950 11.6407002
350    238.3351 17.0814910
351    255.9829  7.4520288
352    272.2687 14.0032993
369    254.6806 11.3395026
370    225.7922 15.2897506
371    252.2121  9.4791309
372    263.7196 11.7513157

The coef.merMod is simply the sum of ranef + fixef for each explanatory variable for each level of each grouping factor.

With the arm package, you can get standard errors for fixed and random effects with se.fixef and se.ranef (and se.coef, which is, however, only a concatanation of the two first outputs).

My question is: is the SE of coefficients simply coef(ranef) + coef(fixef)? Or do the sums of random and fixed coefficients have no real standard error?

Daniel
  • 7,252
  • 6
  • 26
  • 38

0 Answers0