In my programme I've a large array of strings(say 1600) which I want to show as a CheckBox
list. The array is actually the location of all the songs in one's PC, and thus can gradually be bigger. I don't wanna use ListView<String>
as the CheckBox
list is more efficient and above all visually better for my purpose. I'm currently doing the below :
private void listAll() {
songs = MediaManager.getAllSongs();
VBox vb = new VBox();
vb.setSpacing(5);
vb.getStyleClass().add("background");
if (songs != null) {
Service s = new Service() {
@Override
protected Task createTask() {
Task t = new Task() {
@Override
protected Object call() throws Exception {
for (String song : songs) {
addSong(song, vb);
c++;
updateMessage(c+" songs");
}
return null;
}
};
t.messageProperty().addListener((obs,o,n)->{
count.setText(n);
});
return t;
}
};
s.start();
ScrollPane sp = new ScrollPane(vb);
getChildren().add(sp);
}
}
private void addSong(String n, Pane p) {
String toAdd = "";
Media m = new Media(Paths.get(n).toUri().toString());
if (m.getMetadata().get("title") == null || !(m.getMetadata().get("title").equals(""))) {
toAdd = m.getSource().split("/")[m.getSource().split("/").length - 1].replace("%20", " ").replace(".mp3", "");
} else {
toAdd = ((String) m.getMetadata().get("title"));
}
SongBox s = new SongBox(toAdd);
s.setUserData(n);
p.getChildren().add(s);
}
class SongBox extends CheckBox {
public SongBox(String t) {
this();
setText(t);
}
public SongBox() {
super();
setOnAction((ActionEvent evt) -> {
if (isSelected()) {
if (!playNow.isVisible()) {
playNow.setVisible(true);
}
path = (String) getUserData();
selected.add((String) getUserData());
} else {
selected.remove((String) getUserData());
if (selected.size() == 0) {
playNow.setVisible(false);
}
}
});
}
}
First of all, that is not showing the complete array. Whenever I'm going back and returning to it, the number of songs get changed. Secondly, the whole UI is getting sluggish(sometimes also hanging my PC). Moreover, I can't cancel the Service
when I've gone to the previous window, as it's always returning false
. Anyone have a better approach?