6

My Tomcat Container needs data that has to be well protected, i.e. passwords for database access and certificates and keys for Single Sign On to other systems.

I´ve seen some suggestions to use -e or -env-file to pass secret data to a container but this can be discovered with docker inspect (-env-file also shows all the properties of the file in docker inspect).

Another approach is to link a data container with the secrets to the service container but I don´t like the concept of having this data container in my registry (accessible for a broader range of people). I know I can set up a private registry, but I would need different registries for test and production and still everyone with access to the production registry could access the secret data.

I´m thinking about setting up my servers with a directory that contains the secret data and to mount the secret data into my containers. This would work nicely with test- and production servers having different secrets. But it creates a dependency of the containers to my specific servers.

So my question is: How do you handle secret data, what´s the best solution to that problem?

christian
  • 9,412
  • 10
  • 41
  • 51
  • This has been discussed in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30749899/hide-obfuscate-environmental-parameters-in-docker – Sergei Rodionov Sep 19 '15 at 08:08
  • envvars are probably good enough: http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/70827/passing-secret-keys-securely-to-docker-containers – Assaf Lavie Sep 19 '15 at 14:25
  • Possible duplicate of [Docker and securing passwords](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22651647/docker-and-securing-passwords) – Murmel Jan 26 '18 at 11:37

2 Answers2

4

Update January 2017

Docker 1.13 now has the command docker secret with docker swarm.
See also "Why is ARG in a DOCKERFILE not recommended for passing secrets?".

Original answer (Sept 2015)

The notion of docker vault, alluded to by Adrian Mouat in his previous answer, was actively discussed in issue 1030 (the discussion continues on issues 13490).

It was for now rejected as being out of scope for docker, but also included:

We've come up with a simple solution to this problem: A bash script that once executed through a single RUN command, downloads private keys from a local HTTP server, executes a given command and deletes the keys afterwards.

Since we do all of this in a single RUN, nothing gets cached in the image. Here is how it looks in the Dockerfile:

RUN ONVAULT npm install --unsafe-perm

Our first implementation around this concept is available at dockito/vault.

To develop images locally we use a custom development box that runs the Dockito Vault as a service.

The only drawback is requiring the HTTP server running, so no Docker hub builds.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
VonC
  • 1,262,500
  • 529
  • 4,410
  • 5,250
0

Mount the encrypted keys into container, then pass the password via pipe. The difficulty comes with the detach mode, which will hang while reading the pipe within the container. Here is a trick to work around:

cid=$(docker run -d -i alpine sh -c 'read A; echo "[$A]"; exec some-server')
docker exec -i $cid sh -c 'cat > /proc/1/fd/0' <<< _a_secret_

First, create the docker daemon with -i option, the command read A will hang waiting for the input from /proc/1/fd/0; Then run the second docker command, reading the secret from stdin and redirect to the last hanging process.

James Z.M. Gao
  • 516
  • 1
  • 8
  • 13