217

Is it possible when creating a RelativeLayout at runtime to set the equivalent of android:layout_below programmatically?

Onik
  • 19,396
  • 14
  • 68
  • 91
AlanH
  • 2,191
  • 2
  • 13
  • 6

4 Answers4

484

Yes:

RelativeLayout.LayoutParams params= new RelativeLayout.LayoutParams(ViewGroup.LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT,ViewGroup.LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT); 
params.addRule(RelativeLayout.BELOW, R.id.below_id);
viewToLayout.setLayoutParams(params);

First, the code creates a new layout params by specifying the height and width. The addRule method adds the equivalent of the xml properly android:layout_below. Then you just call View#setLayoutParams on the view you want to have those params.

Pankaj Lilan
  • 4,245
  • 1
  • 29
  • 48
Rich Schuler
  • 41,814
  • 6
  • 72
  • 59
154

Alternatively you can use the views current layout parameters and modify them:

RelativeLayout.LayoutParams params = (RelativeLayout.LayoutParams) viewToLayout.getLayoutParams();
params.addRule(RelativeLayout.BELOW, R.id.below_id);
jackofallcode
  • 1,935
  • 1
  • 13
  • 15
  • 14
    @EelLee It's pretty clearly another way to answer the question, which is why it has 11 upvotes. – Alex K Jan 04 '15 at 20:50
  • 9
    This should have more upvotes than the other answer: to maintain consistent behavior of the view, we should work with existing `LayoutParams` rather than creating new ones. In fact, this should be accepted as the correct answer. – Kevin Kopf Oct 19 '16 at 21:27
13

While @jackofallcode answer is correct, it can be written in one line:

((RelativeLayout.LayoutParams) viewToLayout.getLayoutParams()).addRule(RelativeLayout.BELOW, R.id.below_id);
CoolMind
  • 26,736
  • 15
  • 188
  • 224
  • 1
    this doesn't allow you to actually change the layout as you need a reference to the `LayoutParams` to set them with `setLayoutParams` – Stef Nov 18 '18 at 09:30
  • @Stef, I used this solution in one project. While jackofallcode solution is the only right here, I simplified it. But now I think shortening to one line is not good, because if any exception occurs, it would be harder to understand what operator raised it. – CoolMind Nov 19 '18 at 06:54
  • 1
    @CoolMind I don't really like shortening code to 1 line, it makes it harder to read, especially when casting is involved. Plus doing it my way allows you to make further changes :) – jackofallcode Aug 15 '19 at 09:38
  • @jackofallcode, agree with you! Currently I also write in several lines, because when crash happens, it is easier to understand in what line an error occured. – CoolMind Aug 15 '19 at 10:12
5

Kotlin version with infix function

infix fun View.below(view: View) {
      (this.layoutParams as? RelativeLayout.LayoutParams)?.addRule(RelativeLayout.BELOW, view.id)
}

Then you can write:

view1 below view2

Or you can call it as a normal function:

view1.below(view2)
Mahmoud
  • 2,683
  • 1
  • 30
  • 32