Does Visual Studio C++ 2008/2010 support _mm_malloc
officially? It is defined in malloc.h
but I can't find its description in the MSDN library.
Asked
Active
Viewed 7,936 times
7

GManNickG
- 494,350
- 52
- 494
- 543

Kirill V. Lyadvinsky
- 97,037
- 24
- 136
- 212
4 Answers
4
Doesn't answer your question directly, but I think you're suppose to use _aligned_malloc
. If my understanding is correct, _mm_malloc
is for Intel compilers.

GManNickG
- 494,350
- 52
- 494
- 543
-
`_mm_malloc` is supported by gcc, and `_aligned_malloc` is not. Microsoft compiler seems to be support it too, but I can't find any official paper about it. – Kirill V. Lyadvinsky Jul 22 '10 at 08:03
-
It's seems to not be officially supported, the msvc "implementation" is just `#define _mm_malloc(a, b) _aligned_malloc(a, b)` so it's pretty much just a matter of whether you want to rely on MS not changing that(a pretty good assumption is they'll keep that around), or provide a similar define when you're compiling for windows. – nos Jan 19 '11 at 20:28
-
It should be noted that `_aligned_alloc` is **NOT** the C11/C++11 `aligned_alloc` : the parameters are inverted and `_aligned_alloc` is not compatible with `free`. – diapir Jun 17 '14 at 20:31
2
_mm_malloc/_mm_free
supported in Visual Studio 2013 with using the <malloc.h>
header.
0
See Equivalent C code for _mm_ type functions and, more distantly related, How to allocate aligned memory only using the standard library?

Community
- 1
- 1

EmeryBerger
- 3,897
- 18
- 29
-
1I know how to manually achieve alignment. The question wasn't about it. The first link has nothing to do with my question too. – Kirill V. Lyadvinsky Jan 20 '11 at 07:08
-
-
0
Doesn't memalign() in <malloc.h>
solve this? The man-page says it's obsolete, but ...

Maister
- 4,978
- 1
- 31
- 34