You should consider using aligned
inside an equation
:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\begin{align}
Position_{increment}(t) &= K_{P1}.(Tension_{limit} - Sensor(t)) \\
&+ K_{P2}.(Sensor(t) - Sensor_{opposite}(t)) \\
&+ K_I.\sum_{0}^{t}(Tension_{limit} - Sensor(t))
\end{align}
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\text{Position}_{\text{increment}}(t) &= K_{P1} \cdot \bigl( \text{Tension}_{\text{limit}} - \text{Sensor}(t) \bigr) \\
&\phantom{{}={}} + K_{P2} \cdot \bigl( \text{Sensor}(t) - \text{Sensor}_{\text{opposite}}(t) \bigr) \\
&\phantom{{}={}} + K_I \cdot \sum_0^t \bigl( \text{Tension}_{\text{limit}} - \text{Sensor}(t) \bigr)
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{document}
I've updated the spacing around the missing =
relation to reflect what it should look like. Also, if you're using text in equations, then use \text
, or create your own "variable macro" \var{<stuff>}
, for consistency:
\newcommand{\var}{\text}