I want a random number between 0 and 1, like 0.3452. I used random.randrange(0, 1)
but it is always 0 for me. What should I do?
-
4@gidim: this is more specific question e.g., `random.random()` (`[0,1)`) is the answer to this question but not the question you've linked and therefore it is not a duplicate. – jfs Oct 27 '15 at 04:28
-
1randrange(a,b) returns INTEGERS between a (incl.) and b (excl.) – Julien Oct 27 '15 at 06:26
-
import numpy as np np.random.random_sample((120)) – BigData-Guru Aug 23 '20 at 19:20
7 Answers
You can use random.uniform
import random
random.uniform(0, 1)

- 27,144
- 16
- 62
- 82
-
5
-
4
-
12To get always same numbers, ensure to set a seed first, just `random.seed(123)` – Rodrigo Laguna Feb 06 '18 at 14:49
random.random()
does exactly that
>>> import random
>>> for i in range(10):
... print(random.random())
...
0.908047338626
0.0199900075962
0.904058545833
0.321508119045
0.657086320195
0.714084413092
0.315924955063
0.696965958019
0.93824013683
0.484207425759
If you want really random numbers, and to cover the range [0, 1]:
>>> import os
>>> int.from_bytes(os.urandom(8), byteorder="big") / ((1 << 64) - 1)
0.7409674234050893

- 295,403
- 53
- 369
- 502
-
7random.random return values between [0,1) so then return would never be 1. – gidim Oct 27 '15 at 04:03
-
1@gidim: `randrange(a, b)` excludes `b` as well as anything `*range()` in Python. Python uses [option a)](https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD08xx/EWD831.html). OP shows `randrange()`, not `randint()` that includes both edges. – jfs Oct 27 '15 at 04:29
-
2Even if it would include, the probability to return 1 would be extremely low (as in practice there is a 64 digits precision of python's float), so it wouldn't change much. – szedjani Sep 30 '19 at 09:34
I want a random number between 0 and 1, like 0.3452
random.random()
is what you are looking for:
From python docs: random.random() Return the next random floating point number in the range [0.0, 1.0).
And, btw, Why your try didn't work?:
Your try was: random.randrange(0, 1)
From python docs: random.randrange() Return a randomly selected element from range(start, stop, step). This is equivalent to choice(range(start, stop, step)), but doesn’t actually build a range object.
So, what you are doing here, with random.randrange(a,b)
is choosing a random element from range(a,b)
; in your case, from range(0,1)
, but, guess what!: the only element in range(0,1)
, is 0
, so, the only element you can choose from range(0,1)
, is 0
; that's why you were always getting 0
back.

- 1,589
- 13
- 11
you can use use numpy.random module, you can get array of random number in shape of your choice you want
>>> import numpy as np
>>> np.random.random(1)[0]
0.17425892129128229
>>> np.random.random((3,2))
array([[ 0.7978787 , 0.9784473 ],
[ 0.49214277, 0.06749958],
[ 0.12944254, 0.80929816]])
>>> np.random.random((3,1))
array([[ 0.86725993],
[ 0.36869585],
[ 0.2601249 ]])
>>> np.random.random((4,1))
array([[ 0.87161403],
[ 0.41976921],
[ 0.35714702],
[ 0.31166808]])
>>> np.random.random_sample()
0.47108547995356098

- 19,069
- 5
- 54
- 72
This solution works!
random.randrange(0,2)

- 1,432
- 7
- 17

- 1,971
- 17
- 8
-
For reference, the OP wanted a float between 0 and 1 but this will return a choice between integers 0 and 1. – JasTonAChair Nov 05 '16 at 03:38
-
1How does this answers the question? One is looking for a floating point number between 0 and 1 (exclusive). – Willem Van Onsem Jan 13 '17 at 12:43
RTM
From the docs for the Python random
module:
Functions for integers:
random.randrange(stop)
random.randrange(start, stop[, step])
Return a randomly selected element from range(start, stop, step).
This is equivalent to choice(range(start, stop, step)), but doesn’t
actually build a range object.
That explains why it only gives you 0, doesn't it. range(0,1)
is [0]
. It is choosing from a list consisting of only that value.
Also from those docs:
random.random()
Return the next random floating point number in the range [0.0, 1.0).
But if your inclusion of the numpy
tag is intentional, you can generate many random floats in that range with one call using a np.random
function.

- 221,503
- 14
- 230
- 353
My variation that I find to be more flexible.
str_Key = ""
str_FullKey = ""
str_CharacterPool = "01234ABCDEFfghij~-)"
for int_I in range(64):
str_Key = random.choice(str_CharacterPool)
str_FullKey = str_FullKey + str_Key

- 1,085
- 9
- 13