I am relatively new to (Relational) Data Base design. I am confused on the advice that
many, if not most 1:1 relations are signs of a poorly-design ERM, and that
the two entities in 1:1 relation should be merged into a single one unless there
is a strong reason to do otherwise. But I have not found clear advice on when
to do so. Any explanations, references appreciated.
EDIT: I think my situation is different because I have a different starting point: I am given a business situation in which I have to identify entities, their relations , etc. I am given two entities in a 1:1 relationship and I want to know when/if I should merge them into a single entity. I have not seen this point addressed in any other question. If someone does link me to a question that does address this, I may just delete my post, but I want to let it stand otherwise.
EDIT 2: To be more specific, I have a situation in which each employee manages one department and every department is managed by exactly one employee.
EDIT 3: I guess it comes down to distinguishing between an attribute and an entity. My thoughts are that , as a rule of thumb, given a description of a situation, a verb indicates a relationship . Another constraint I can think of is violation of "atomicity" or 1NF in which an attribute is many-valued, e.g., if we have "package" and there is mention of package contents, if there are many contents described, then "contents" is made into an entity, to avoid multiple entries. Maybe this is simpler than I first thought.
Thanks.;