85

I'm trying to upgrade my project L5.1 -> L5.2. In upgrade guide there's one thing which isn't clear for me:

The lists method on the Collection, query builder and Eloquent query builder objects has been renamed to pluck. The method signature remains the same.

That's ok, rename refactoting from lists() to pluck() isn't a problem. But what with useful pluck() method which was in L5.0 and L5.1?

From the 5.0 documentation:

Retrieving A Single Column From A Row

$name = DB::table('users')->where('name', 'John')->pluck('name');

What is the alternative for old pluck() method in L5.2?

UPDATE:

Example:

var_dump(DB::table('users')->where('id', 1)->pluck('id'));

L5.1:

// int(1)

L5.2:

// array(1) { [0]=> int(1) }
Limon Monte
  • 52,539
  • 45
  • 182
  • 213
  • 16
    Yeah, this is pretty confusing. In 5.0, `pluck()` meant select 1 field from a row. Then in 5.1, they removed `pluck()` and replaced it with `value()`. Then in 5.2, they replace `lists()`, which returns the whole column, with `pluck()`. So if you've been around since 4.2, you might get confused :/ – Captain Hypertext Apr 12 '16 at 16:11

5 Answers5

128

The current alternative for pluck() is value().

user1669496
  • 32,176
  • 9
  • 73
  • 65
  • 2
    Thank you! This absolutely should be in the upgrade guide as it's breaking change. – Limon Monte Dec 21 '15 at 22:30
  • 2
    I see that it is in upgrade guide for 5.1: http://laravel.com/docs/5.2/upgrade#upgrade-5.1.0 My bad I didn't catch this change in prev release. – Limon Monte Dec 21 '15 at 22:31
  • There is actually notice about this change: "The Eloquent collection instance now returns a base Collection (`Illuminate\Support\Collection`) for the following methods: `pluck`, ..." – Limon Monte Dec 21 '15 at 22:43
  • It is much easier to use value as it is in ready non array form.. especially in toggle type operations – DragonFire Jan 03 '20 at 09:23
  • 1
    can someone please explain the reasoning behind such naming? why not "column"? – ddruganov Dec 08 '21 at 12:30
22

In Laravel 5.1+, you can use the value() instead of pluck.

To get first occurence, You can either use

DB::table('users')->value('name');

or use,

DB::table('users')->where('id', 1)->pluck('name')->first();
reshma
  • 672
  • 8
  • 24
21

laravel pluck returns an array

if your query is:

 $name = DB::table('users')->where('name', 'John')->pluck('name');

then the array is like this (key is the index of the item. auto incremented value):

[
    1 => "name1",
    2 => "name2",
    .
    .
    .
    100 => "name100"
]

but if you do like this:

$name = DB::table('users')->where('name', 'John')->pluck('name','id');

then the key is actual index in the database.

key||value
[
    1 => "name1",
    2 => "name2",
    .
    .
    .
    100 => "name100"
]

you can set any value as key.

Peyman.H
  • 1,819
  • 1
  • 16
  • 26
noone
  • 6,168
  • 2
  • 42
  • 51
14

I use laravel 7.x and I used this as a workaround:->get()->pluck('id')->toArray();

it gives back an array of ids [50,2,3] and this is the whole query I used:

   $article_tags = DB::table('tags')
    ->join('taggables', function ($join) use ($id) {
        $join->on('tags.id', '=', 'taggables.tag_id');
        $join->where([
            ['taggable_id', '=', $id],
            ['taggable_type','=','article']
        ]);
    })->select('tags.id')->get()->pluck('id')->toArray();
Furqan S. Mahmoud
  • 1,417
  • 2
  • 13
  • 26
  • `AModel::select('id',...)->where(...)->get()->pluck('id');` gives array of integer values of `id`, when `AModel::select('id',...)->where(...)->get()->pluck('id')->toArray();` gives array alike `[0=>id0, 1=>id1,...., n=>idN]`, Have tested. – CodeToLife Jul 01 '21 at 17:54
-1

In the original example, why not use the select() method in your database query?

$name = DB::table('users')->where('name', 'John')->select("id");

This will be faster than using a PHP framework, for it'll utilize the SQL query to do the row selection for you. For ordinary collections, I don't believe this applies, but since you're using a database...

Larvel 5.3: Specifying a Select Clause