3

I setup a bitbucket server on a 2012r2 VM.

I can successfully clone, push, commit from the Git command line.

After reading this blogpost written by Luis Navarro (Embarcadero), I thought this was going to be an easy setup.

However, whenever I try to clone a project, I get the following error message:

error

The weird thing is I chose to access http://MYURL.org/scm/waaad/vcl.git but it automatically changed to https instead.

Also, when I try use SSH instead, the error stays the same but gets displayed in a MessageBox instead:

error

Grabbing sources from e.g. https://github.com/project-jedi/jvcl.git works fine.

Has anyone with a local installation of a Git repository encountered the same problems?

Are there any alternative Git implementations other then the default one by Embarcadero?

Edit:

Based on Rob Kennedy's comment i changed the Git-Option exectuable to:

enter image description here

The SSL-error is gone now but it still can't clone because:

enter image description here

Is there any way to stop it automatically changing the http to https? I think thats the reason it can't locate the repository.

Johan
  • 74,508
  • 24
  • 191
  • 319
Tommy
  • 596
  • 6
  • 30
  • 1
    Presumably, grabbing code from GitHub works fine because GitHub's certificate looks legit, whereas yours doesn't. Can you [configure git to accept your self-signed certificate](http://stackoverflow.com/q/11621768/33732)? – Rob Kennedy Jan 29 '16 at 23:37
  • 1
    I don't have a certificate and i use http intead of https. I am not sure what certificate RadStudio expects and why it changes my http clone request to https. – Tommy Jan 30 '16 at 05:15
  • 2
    IDE integration is over rated. Especially when it is poorly implemented and limited in scope. Use a different tool for your revision control. – David Heffernan Jan 30 '16 at 08:17
  • 1
    @DavidHeffernan I don't think IDE integration is over rated. It's convenient to have access to your version control with the tool you are developing with. I agree that the implementation is bad and needs improvment. – Tommy Jan 30 '16 at 10:57
  • 3
    It would be convenient if it were functional. It isn't. – David Heffernan Jan 30 '16 at 11:08
  • Pardon the obvious question, but don't BitBucket's vendors have anything to say about this problem? – MartynA Jan 30 '16 at 11:30
  • 1
    @MartynA https://confluence.atlassian.com/bitbucketserver/securing-bitbucket-server-with-apache-using-ssl-776640117.html – mjn Jan 30 '16 at 11:40

1 Answers1

4

From the official documentation:

https://confluence.atlassian.com/bitbucketserver/securing-bitbucket-server-with-apache-using-ssl-776640117.html

You can run Bitbucket Server behind a reverse proxy, such as Apache HTTP Server or nginx, that is secured using HTTPS (HTTP over SSL). You should consider doing this, and making secure access mandatory, if usernames, passwords and other proprietary data may be at risk.

My initial answer (actually saying the same):

If no better solution comes up, I would install Apache or nginx on the Git server and configure it as a reverse HTTPS proxy.

Example configuration: https://serverfault.com/questions/486042/use-apache-as-a-https-to-http-proxy

RAD Studio then should happily be using HTTPS. The Apache Server communicates with Git over HTTP. Both sides happy :)

Community
  • 1
  • 1
mjn
  • 36,362
  • 28
  • 176
  • 378