How std::transform and std::plus work together?

Question

I was reading C++ reference and came across std::plus function with an example. Which is pretty straight forward, its simply adds lhs and rhs. The code was:

#include <functional>
#include <iostream>

int main()
{
   std::string a = "Hello ";
   const char* b = "world";
   std::cout << std::plus<>{}(a, b) << '\n';
}

output: Hello world

I changed it to

#include <functional>
#include <iostream>

int main()
{
   int a = 5;
   int b = 1;
   std::cout << std::plus<int>{}(a, b) << '\n';
}

output : 6

Now I made

foo vector = 10 20 30 40 50
bar vector = 11 21 31 41 51

I called:

std::transform (foo.begin(), foo.end(), bar.begin(), foo.begin(), std::plus<int>());

and it gave 21 41 61 81 101 which I understand it is adding up both foo and bar. But how it was passed to std::plus function?

Does this not answer your question? I guess you'll have already looked at it or you wouldn't have figured out how to call `std::transform`. http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/algorithm/transform — 5gon12eder, Feb 23 '16 at 04:12

Brian Rodriguez · Accepted Answer · 2019-08-03T01:42:06.107

11

std::plus<> is a functor, which is just fancy talk for a class that implements operator(). Here's an example:

struct plus {
    template <typename A, typename B>
    auto operator()(const A& a, const B& b) const { return a + b; }
};

The std::transform you have there is roughly equivalent to:

template<typename InputIt1, typename InputIt2, 
         typename OutputIt, typename BinaryOperation>
OutputIt transform(InputIt1 first1, InputIt1 last1, InputIt2 first2, 
                   OutputIt d_first, BinaryOperation binary_op)
{
    while (first1 != last1) {
        *d_first++ = binary_op(*first1++, *first2++);
    }
    return d_first;
}

Here, binary_op is the name given to std::plus<>. Since std::plus<> is a functor, C++ will interpret the "call" to it as a call to the operator() function, giving us our desired behavior.

edited Aug 03 '19 at 01:42

answered Feb 23 '16 at 04:19

Brian Rodriguez

4,250
1
16
37

1

It was an example for demonstration purposes not a submission for inclusion to the standard. – Kurt Stutsman Feb 23 '16 at 04:36
What do you mean by "Normally, this would fail at compile time" – M.M Feb 23 '16 at 04:57
@M.M If it weren't a functor/if it hadn't implemented `operator()`. – Brian Rodriguez Feb 23 '16 at 04:58

score 1 · Answer 2 · answered Feb 23 '16 at 04:46

std::plus one of a set of functors provided by the STL. If your familiar with functional programming, they are a convenience for function composition. std::plus specifically is a binary operator, so it takes two arguments. std::Transform will send it elements from the two vectors. You can also use std::bind to turn binary operators into one argument operators, basically binding a constant to the second argument.

Personally I think std::plus and its like were more useful before the advent of c++11 lambda functions. Lambda's allow you to define a set of operations to perform on your data without having to deal with binds or std::plus and its ilk.

How std::transform and std::plus work together?

2 Answers2

Linked