Both the pandas.crosstab and the Pandas pivot table seem to provide the exact same functionality. Are there any differences?
5 Answers
The main difference between the two is the pivot_table
expects your input data to already be a DataFrame; you pass a DataFrame to pivot_table
and specify the index
/columns
/values
by passing the column names as strings. With cross_tab
, you don't necessarily need to have a DataFrame going in, as you just pass array-like objects for index
/columns
/values
.
Looking at the source code for crosstab
, it essentially takes the array-like objects you pass, creates a DataFrame, then calls pivot_table
as appropriate.
In general, use pivot_table
if you already have a DataFrame, so you don't have the additional overhead of creating the same DataFrame again. If you're starting from array-like objects and are only concerned with the pivoted data, use crosstab
. In most cases, I don't think it will really make a difference which function you decide to use.

- 32,715
- 6
- 74
- 87
-
1I timed a few options, and turns out pivot_table is one order of magnitude slower than crosstab, and even that is slower than a simple but clunky groupby approach, [here](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51503717/alternative-to-groupby-for-generating-a-summary-table-from-tidy-pandas-dataframe) – MPa Oct 31 '18 at 05:09
-
1@Mpa this makes no sense. crosstab calls pivot_table, how is crosstab going to be faster? crosstab adds overhead. This article shows crosstab is the slowest between groupby, pivot_table and crosstab https://ramiro.org/notebook/pandas-crosstab-groupby-pivot/ – Guzman Ojero Aug 13 '21 at 13:39
Is it the same, if in pivot_table
use aggfunc=len
and fill_value=0
:
pd.crosstab(df['Col X'], df['Col Y'])
pd.pivot_table(df, index=['Col X'], columns=['Col Y'], aggfunc=len, fill_value=0)
EDIT: There is more difference:
Default aggfunc
are different: pivot_table
- np.mean
, crosstab
- len
.
Parameter margins_name
is only in pivot_table
.
In pivot_table
you can use Grouper
for index
and columns
keywords.
I think if you need simply frequency table, crosstab
function is better.

- 822,522
- 95
- 1,334
- 1,252
-
-
pivot_table has a bit more 'analytical' flexibility, such as filling NA values, adding subtotals, etc., but absolutely at the cost of more overhead, as mentioned above. – rocksteady Feb 20 '19 at 20:33
-
1regarding overhead it is just the other way round (if there is any performance difference at all), as `crosstab` first creates a dataframe and then [calls `pivot_table`](https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/v0.25.0/pandas/core/reshape/pivot.py#L570). – Stef Aug 07 '19 at 14:54
The pivot_table
does not have the normalize
argument, unfortunately.
In crosstab
, the normalize
argument calculates percentages by dividing each cell by the sum of cells, as described below:
normalize = 'index'
divides each cell by the sum of its rownormalize = 'columns'
divides each cell by the sum of its columnnormalize = True
divides each cell by the total of all cells in the table

- 909
- 9
- 8
-
3For me this seems the most notorius difference. I think it is very strange that this functionality is not included in `pivot_table`. – rocarvaj Apr 24 '22 at 03:04
Pivot table shows the values from data. Crosstab represent frequency of the data .

- 11
- 1
-
Please provide some example to explain your answer using `crosstab` and `pivot_table`. That way, the your answer will be much clearer. – Azhar Khan Dec 09 '22 at 05:09
-
You can do multiple types of aggregation with crosstabs not just counts by specifying the aggfunc argument. – NathanLite Jan 10 '23 at 14:11
Crosstab utilized count() aggregation to fill the values while pivot_table would use any other aggregation such as sum().

- 125
- 11