- I fork a master repo on Bitbucket.com?
- I create a new branch called "branch-A" on my copied repo from #1.
- I switch to "branch-A"
- I point "upstream" to the master repo. I did a "git fetch upstream"
- I ran "git merge upstream/master"
It is strange to me at at step 5, git merge DID NOT apply the merge to the master branch on my local repo, instead, it applied the merge to "branch-A". Is this the proper behavior of git? Or I'm missing something here?