2

I have a string of text and want to ensure that it contains at most one single occurrence of a specific character (,). Therefore I want to keep the first one, but simply remove all further occurrences of that character.

How could I do this the most elegant way using C#?

Byte Commander
  • 6,506
  • 6
  • 44
  • 71

7 Answers7

4

This works, but not the most elegant for sure :-)

string a = "12,34,56,789";
int pos = 1 + a.IndexOf(',');
return a.Substring(0, pos) + a.Substring(pos).Replace(",", string.Empty);
jackomelly
  • 523
  • 1
  • 8
  • 15
  • I find it elegant ;) Has just one drawback if you want to keep 2 chars f.e. – Tim Schmelter Apr 08 '16 at 14:39
  • @TimSchmelter What do you mean by "keep 2 chars"? – silkfire Jan 06 '22 at 15:21
  • @silkfire: well, try to specify that you don't want to remove all but the first, instead all but the first 2 – Tim Schmelter Jan 06 '22 at 15:29
  • I see what you mean now. For that you could replace `a.IndexOf` with a method that returns the Nth occurrence of a substring: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/186653/get-the-index-of-the-nth-occurrence-of-a-string – silkfire Jan 06 '22 at 19:20
2

You could use a counter variable and a StringBuilder to create the new string efficiently:

var sb = new StringBuilder(text.Length);
int maxCount = 1;
int currentCount = 0;
char specialChar = ',';
foreach(char c in text)
    if(c != specialChar || ++currentCount <= maxCount)
        sb.Append(c);
text = sb.ToString();

This approach is not the shortest but it's efficient and you can specify the char-count to keep.

Here's a more "elegant" way using LINQ:

int commasFound = 0; int maxCommas = 1;
text = new string(text.Where(c => c != ',' || ++commasFound <= maxCommas).ToArray());

I don't like it because it requires to modify a variable from a query, so it's causing a side-effect.

Tim Schmelter
  • 450,073
  • 74
  • 686
  • 939
  • I'd call the LINQ one pretty elegant :) – Rawling Apr 08 '16 at 14:50
  • 1
    @Rawling: edited my answer to comment why i don't like it (even if i love LINQ). – Tim Schmelter Apr 08 '16 at 14:51
  • I really like your LINQ statement, but I don't understand the side effects you mention yet. What are you expecting to happen there? – Byte Commander Apr 10 '16 at 09:50
  • In this case it works without a problem. But the use and initialisation of local variables in linq queries is a bomb which can explode under more complex situations or queries. This variable has only one state but a query can be executed in multiple ways, for example if you include OrderBy. So best practices is to use a method for such tasks where the variable is encapsulated. – Tim Schmelter Apr 10 '16 at 12:09
2

You could write a function like the following one that would split the string into two sections based on the location of what you were searching (via the String.Split() method) for and it would only remove matches from the second section (using String.Replace()) :

public static string RemoveAllButFirst(string s, string stuffToRemove)
{
    // Check if the stuff to replace exists and if not, return the original string
    var locationOfStuff = s.IndexOf(stuffToRemove);
    if (locationOfStuff < 0)
    {
        return s;
    }
    // Calculate where to pull the first string from and then replace the rest of the string
    var splitLocation = locationOfStuff + stuffToRemove.Length;
    return s.Substring(0, splitLocation) +  (s.Substring(splitLocation)).Replace(stuffToRemove,"");
}

You could simply call it by using :

var output = RemoveAllButFirst(input,",");

A prettier approach might actually involve building an extension method that handled this a bit more cleanly :

public static class StringExtensions
{
     public static string RemoveAllButFirst(this string s, string stuffToRemove)
     {
           // Check if the stuff to replace exists and if not, return the 
           // original string
           var locationOfStuff = s.IndexOf(stuffToRemove);
           if (locationOfStuff < 0)
           {
               return s;
           }
           // Calculate where to pull the first string from and then replace the rest of the string
           var splitLocation = locationOfStuff + stuffToRemove.Length;
           return s.Substring(0, splitLocation) +  (s.Substring(splitLocation)).Replace(stuffToRemove,"");
     }
}

which would be called via :

var output = input.RemoveAllButFirst(",");

You can see a working example of it here.

Rion Williams
  • 74,820
  • 37
  • 200
  • 327
  • `StringExtensions` needs to be static class and first param needs to be `this string s` – Itsik Apr 08 '16 at 18:48
  • For some reason it looks like my response had been submitted mid-response without me noticing. I've updated the function accordingly. Thanks for the heads up. – Rion Williams Apr 08 '16 at 18:54
1

Regular expressions are elegant, right?

Regex.Replace("Eats, shoots, and leaves.", @"(?<=,.*),", "");

This replaces every comma, as long as there is a comma before it, with nothing.

(Actually, it's probably not elegant - it may only be one line of code, but it may also be O(n^2)...)

Rawling
  • 49,248
  • 7
  • 89
  • 127
1

If you don't deal with large strings and you reaaaaaaly like Linq oneliners:

public static string KeepFirstOccurence (this string @string, char @char)
{
    var index = @string.IndexOf(@char);
    return String.Concat(String.Concat(@string.TakeWhile(x => @string.IndexOf(x) < index + 1)), String.Concat(@string.SkipWhile(x=>@string.IndexOf(x) < index)).Replace(@char.ToString(), ""));
}
Nikola.Lukovic
  • 1,256
  • 1
  • 16
  • 33
0
    static string KeepFirstOccurance(this string str, char c)
    {
        int charposition = str.IndexOf(c);
        return str.Substring(0, charposition + 1) +
                   str.Substring(charposition, str.Length - charposition)
                   .Replace(c, ' ').Trim();
    }
ManoDestra
  • 6,325
  • 6
  • 26
  • 50
-1

Pretty short with Linq; split string into chars, keep distinct set and join back to a string.

text = string.Join("", text.Select(c => c).Distinct());
Mattias Åslund
  • 3,877
  • 2
  • 18
  • 17