I guess it's a question of pros & cons.
For simple data crypting:
What are the real benefits of using openssl_encrypt
over mcrypt_encrypt
?
I guess it's a question of pros & cons.
For simple data crypting:
What are the real benefits of using openssl_encrypt
over mcrypt_encrypt
?
Don't use mcrypt. If you're typing the word mcrypt into your code, you're probably making a mistake. Although it's possible to provide a relatively secure cryptography library that builds on top of mcrypt (the earlier version of defuse/php-encryption did), switching your code to openssl will provide better security, performance, maintainability, and portability. source: paragonie.com
Speed openssl is faster. Take a look at the following table source: jrm.cc
# php examples/compare.php
Results:
+---------+--------+----------+-------------+--------------+
| ext | keylen | textsize | (en/de)code | ops/sec |
+---------+--------+----------+-------------+--------------+
| mcrypt | 128 | short | enc | 5626.38872 |
| mcrypt | 128 | short | dec | 5729.21909 |
| mcrypt | 192 | short | enc | 5694.37256 |
| mcrypt | 192 | short | dec | 5682.78434 |
| mcrypt | 256 | short | enc | 5644.36358 |
| mcrypt | 256 | short | dec | 5661.23080 |
| mcrypt | 128 | medium | enc | 5583.97725 |
| mcrypt | 128 | medium | dec | 5650.75122 |
| mcrypt | 192 | medium | enc | 5591.54051 |
| mcrypt | 192 | medium | dec | 5552.83950 |
| mcrypt | 256 | medium | enc | 5524.18533 |
| mcrypt | 256 | medium | dec | 5513.65563 |
| mcrypt | 128 | long | enc | 4773.67544 |
| mcrypt | 128 | long | dec | 4774.14273 |
| mcrypt | 192 | long | enc | 4633.75035 |
| mcrypt | 192 | long | dec | 4634.35450 |
| mcrypt | 256 | long | enc | 4494.90529 |
| mcrypt | 256 | long | dec | 4280.92422 |
| openssl | 128 | short | enc | 168581.35048 |
| openssl | 128 | short | dec | 170417.03234 |
| openssl | 192 | short | enc | 172052.83452 |
| openssl | 192 | short | dec | 171349.94689 |
| openssl | 256 | short | enc | 171112.27154 |
| openssl | 256 | short | dec | 171644.45899 |
| openssl | 128 | medium | enc | 166944.11718 |
| openssl | 128 | medium | dec | 169084.25381 |
| openssl | 192 | medium | enc | 166665.50107 |
| openssl | 192 | medium | dec | 168459.47466 |
| openssl | 256 | medium | enc | 163878.40900 |
| openssl | 256 | medium | dec | 167946.82470 |
| openssl | 128 | long | enc | 110370.61207 |
| openssl | 128 | long | dec | 142731.36868 |
| openssl | 192 | long | enc | 103798.85171 |
| openssl | 192 | long | dec | 135396.21667 |
| openssl | 256 | long | enc | 96767.81100 |
| openssl | 256 | long | dec | 132203.99672 |
+---------+--------+----------+-------------+--------------+
Abandonware mcrypt is basically abandonware. So, especially if you're starting from scratch (or as a php.net comment states you are writing code in 2015), do it right . Go with OpenSSL. source: stackoverflow Artjom B.