Let's look at a small example, with n = 2, m = 2:
In Octave (and presumably Matlab):
octave:50> m = 2; n = 2;
octave:51> I_true = [1;2;3;4];
octave:52> A = zeros((2*m*n),(2*m*n)+2);
octave:53> A(1:m*n,(2*m*n)+1)=-I_true(:)
A =
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -3 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -4 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
The equivalent in Python (with n = 20, m = 20) would be
import numpy as np
n, m = 20, 20
I_true = np.arange(1, n*m+1) # just as an example
A = np.zeros((2*m*n, 2*(n*m+1)), dtype=I.dtype)
A[:m*n, 2*m*n] = -I_true
The reason why the last line uses A[:m*n, 2*m*n]
and not A[1:m*n, (2*m*n)+1]
is
because Python uses 0-based indexing whereas Matlab uses 1-based indexing.