13

I can imagine following approaches to exchange Data between multi step forms:

1) Create a component for each form step and exchange data between components over @input, @output (e.g. you cannot change from step5 to 2)

2) Use the new property data in the new router (see here) (e.g. you cannot change from step5 to 2))

3) A shared Service (Dependency Injection) to store data (Component Interaction) (e.g. you can change from step5 to 2)

4) New rudiments with @ngrx/store (not really experienced yet)

Can you give some "gained experience values", what do you use and why?

Community
  • 1
  • 1
  • It is going about models, storing and exchange data between components, multiforms are just an example to use for showing it in action,.. –  Jul 11 '16 at 19:46
  • Yeah, that is, what I like to do –  Jul 11 '16 at 19:58
  • Do you have an angular2 specific solution? –  Jul 12 '16 at 07:54
  • I have formed the basics for MultiStepAuth but can't make it run on [PLUNKER](http://plnkr.co/edit/qDXYC6fU2web0mQ9wG7e?p=preview) , due to App being run in `iframe` , see if it helps. – Ankit Singh Jul 14 '16 at 06:34

2 Answers2

15

See my edit below.


Using SessionStorage is not strictly the 'angular' way to approach this in my opinion—a shared service is the way to go. Implementing routing between steps would be even better (as each component can have its own form and different logic as you see fit:

const multistepRoutes: Routes = [
  {
    path: 'multistep',
    component: MultistepComponent,
    children: [
      {
        path: '',
        component: MultistepBaseComponent,
      },
      {
        path: 'step1',
        component: MultistepStep1Component
      },
      {
        path: 'step2',
        component: MultistepStep2Component
      }
    ]
  }
];

The service multistep.service can hold the model and implement logic for components:

import { Injectable, Inject } from '@angular/core';
import { Router } from '@angular/router';

@Injectable()
export class MultistepService { 

  public model = {};
  public baseRoute = '/multistep';
  public steps = [

    'step1', 
    'step2'

  ];

  constructor (
    @Inject(Router) public router: Router) { };

  public getInitialStep() {

    this.router.navigate([this.baseRoute + '/' + this.steps[0]]);

  };

  public goToNextStep (direction /* pass 'forward' or 'backward' to service from view */): any {

    let stepIndex = this.steps.indexOf(this.router.url.split('/')[2]);

    if (stepIndex === -1 || stepIndex === this.steps.length) return;

    this.router.navigate([this.baseRoute + '/' + this.steps[stepIndex + (direction === 'forward' ? 1 : -1)]]);

  };

}; 

Good luck.


EDIT 12/6/2016


Actually, now having worked with the form API for a while I don't believe my previous answer is the best way to achieve this.

A preferrable approach is to create a top level FormGroup which has each step in your multistep form as it's own FormControl (either a FormGroup or a FormArray) under it's controls property. The top level form in such a case would be the single-source of truth for the form's state, and each step on creation (ngOnInit / constructor) would be able to read data for its respective step from the top level FormGroup. See the pseudocode:

   const topLevelFormGroup = new FormGroup({
       step1: new FormGroup({fieldForStepOne: new FormControl('')}),
       step2: new FormGroup({fieldForStepTwo}),
       // ...
   });

   ... 

   // Step1Component

   class Step1Component { 
       private stepName: string = 'step1';
       private formGroup: FormGroup;
       constructor(private topLevelFormGroup: any /* DI */) {
           this.formGroup = topLevelFormGroup.controls[this.stepName];
       }
    }

Therefore, the state of the form and each step is kept exactly where it should be—in the form itself!

nikk wong
  • 8,059
  • 6
  • 51
  • 68
  • Wow this might be just what I need, will try it! – user875139 Dec 01 '16 at 16:23
  • do you think your (edited) solution would have an equivalent to the routing one with eg canActivate etc on routes? – danimal Dec 06 '16 at 17:34
  • Can you clarify? This basically separates the logic for the form and the logic for the components—so, it shouldn't matter. If you want to you can move the ```stepName``` for each component from the component into the service that provides your formGroup. Then, ```canActivate``` (or anything else) could do checks on different form steps ```this.topLevelFormGroup.controls[this.topLevelFormGroup.steps.current].valid``` or something. – nikk wong Dec 06 '16 at 19:43
  • 2
    Using Nikk's approach child routes can be avoided too. Parent component template can hold child components and Parent Component can show/hide child components based on which user's step movement. In the Parent component you can create main FormGroup with Controls using Reactive Form Creation approach. These form controls will be used in Child components. You can pass the main FormGroup from parent to child using @Input. It means you will be having a single form with several form controls to be used in child components. This way from parent component you will always have updated form values. – Pulak Kanti Bhattacharyya Jun 03 '17 at 12:49
  • 1
    We have done in similar way using Angular2 final version – Pulak Kanti Bhattacharyya Jun 03 '17 at 12:51
9

Why not use session storage? For instance you can use this static helper class (TypeScript):

export class Session {

  static set(key:string, value:any) {
      window.sessionStorage.setItem(key, JSON.stringify(value));
  }

  static get(key:string) {
      if(Session.has(key)) return JSON.parse(window.sessionStorage[key])
      return null;
  }

  static has(key:string) {
      if(window.sessionStorage[key]) return true;
      return false;
  }

  static remove(key:string) {
      Session.set(key,JSON.stringify(null)); // this line is only for IE11 (problems with sessionStorage.removeItem)
      window.sessionStorage.removeItem(key);
  }

}

And using above class, you can put your object with multi-steps-forms data and share it (idea is similar like for 'session helper' in many backend frameworks like e.g. php laravel).


The other approach is to create Singleton service. It can look like that (in very simple from for sake of clarity) (I not test below code, I do it from head):

import { Injectable } from '@angular/core';

@Injectable()
export class SessionService {

    _session = {};

    set(key:string, value:any) {
         this._session[key]= value; // You can also json-ize 'value' here
    }

    get(key:string) {
         return this._session[key]; // optionally de-json-ize here
     }

     has(key:string) {
         if(this.get(key)) return true;
         return false;
     }

     remove(key:string) {         
         this._session[key]=null;
     }
}

And then in your main file where you bootstrap application:

...
return bootstrap(App, [
  ...
  SessionService
])
...

And the last step - critical: When you want to use you singleton service in your component - don't put int in providers section (this is due to angular2 DI behavior - read above link about singleton services). Example below for go from form step 2 to step 3:

import {Component} from '@angular/core';
import {SessionService} from './sessionService.service';
...

@Component({
  selector: 'my-form-step-2',
  // NO 'providers: [ SessionService ]' due to Angular DI behavior for singletons
  template: require('./my-form-step-2.html'),
})

export class MyFormStep2  {

  _formData = null;

  constructor(private _SessionService: SessionService) {
     this._formData = this._SessionService.get('my-form-data')
  }

  ...
  submit() {
     this._SessionService.set('my-form-data', this._formData)
  }

}

It should looks like that.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Kamil Kiełczewski
  • 85,173
  • 29
  • 368
  • 345
  • OK, so instead of session storage, just use global variable to store session values (idea is similar) – Kamil Kiełczewski Jul 11 '16 at 17:44
  • Ok, so you can create a Singleton SessionService which you register on bootstrap (so it will be visible every where in application and create once). This service will implement above similar idea. It is clear? Or you want more details? – Kamil Kiełczewski Jul 11 '16 at 17:48
  • where is the my-form-step-1 ? Do we have for each step a new component? how is the change from 1 to 2 and back? Why is _formData = null; at the step2? Thank you but sorry; that is not an elegant solution :/ –  Jul 11 '16 at 19:02
  • You ask about data exchange. So my answer is above Signleton SessionService. This is the answer. The MyFormStep2 was only example how to use SessionService. Thats all. In this example of ussage I assume that you choose multi component for your multi-step-form (each component for each step) In this approach at the beginning the private variable _formData is null, and and constuctor we set up it by value stored in sessionService. But not focus on this example. Focus on answer -SessionService. And could you explain more why SessionService is not elegant? This approach is common in backend world. – Kamil Kiełczewski Jul 11 '16 at 19:23
  • 1
    What is RequestCounterService by the way? –  Jul 12 '16 at 08:25
  • sorry - it was mistake, i copy-paste some code from my past project - i will correct my answer – Kamil Kiełczewski Jul 12 '16 at 08:38