7

I have an object like

var person = {'id':null, 'name':'John Doe'}

After inserting the object value into the database, I will get another object from the server:

var personInDB = {'id':1234, 'name':'John Doe'}

I have used angular.merge to use updated the value of person with that of personInDB.

But, I want to empty person object before applying angular.merge, so that I only get the values in database. I don't want to assign new empty object to person as that will break data-binding in angular.

Barun
  • 4,245
  • 4
  • 23
  • 29

5 Answers5

6

I want to empty person object...I don't want to assign new empty object to person

I'm not aware of any kind of built-in object .deleteAllProperties() method, so that leaves looping through the properties and calling delete on each individually. Following is a reasonably tidy way to do that:

Object.keys(person).forEach(k => delete person[k])

Or the slightly longer non-ES6 arrow function version for support back as far as IE9:

Object.keys(person).forEach(function(k) { delete person[k]})

For even older IE just use a for..in loop (with a .hasOwnProperty() check).

And obviously you can put any of the above into a function for ease of re-use:

function emptyObject(obj) {
  Object.keys(obj).forEach(k => delete obj[k])
}

emptyObject(person)

Note that although this answers what you've asked, I'm not sure why you think you need to do it at all. The example you show in the question has the same two properties before and after, so angular.merge() would just overwrite the old values with the new values without any need to first empty the object. (Are you trying to allow for a case (not shown) where the old version of your object might have properties that no longer exist in the new version?)

nnnnnn
  • 147,572
  • 30
  • 200
  • 241
  • I want my object to be synced with that of the DB, so if there is problem in the DB code and it doesn't insert `name`, I want set my local object's `name` property deleted. – Barun Sep 05 '16 at 05:26
  • OK, well then the code I've shown should do the emptying you asked for, and I've updated my answer to cover older browsers. – nnnnnn Sep 05 '16 at 05:38
2

If I understand correctly, you seem to think that you need to empty the original object before merging in the new one or the properties from the database won't be used. I don't think that's the case though. I looked at the source for angular.merge and it appears to copy (ie: overwrite) every property from the source object to the destination object. So you shouldn't need to empty it at all, just do the merge and all the values on the database object will be used.

TW80000
  • 1,507
  • 1
  • 11
  • 18
2

if you want empty the 'id' only

person['id']=null;

if you want to empty all attributes of the person object, then

Object.keys(person).forEach(key => person[key]=null);
Karpak
  • 1,927
  • 1
  • 15
  • 16
0

Well, to avoid breaking angularjs's data binding I now update each field manually:

var person = {id : null, name: 'toto'};

// Ajax call
person.id = ajaxres.id;
person.name = ajaxres.name
Stepan Kasyanenko
  • 3,176
  • 1
  • 15
  • 23
Dlacreme
  • 196
  • 1
  • 8
0

If you are using ECAM6,then you can use Destructuring_assignment

[person] = [personInDB ] //Object {id: 1234, name: "John Doe"}

OR

You can have like this.

var arrKeys = Object.keys(person);

  arrKeys.forEach(function(val,key){  

      person[val] =   personInDB[val];

    })
RIYAJ KHAN
  • 15,032
  • 5
  • 31
  • 53
  • When I tried your `[person] = [personInDB ]` code it had the same result as `person = personInDB`, it didn't update the existing object that `person` *did* refer to (which is what the OP is asking about). – nnnnnn Sep 05 '16 at 05:24
  • @nnnnnn can you please tell me how you tested it? It will some additional – RIYAJ KHAN Sep 05 '16 at 05:26
  • https://jsfiddle.net/x457wb4x/ - a result that seems consistent with what the MDN page you linked to says, because it's like an even more simplified version of `[a,b] = [c,d]`... – nnnnnn Sep 05 '16 at 05:31