When should each of these environment variables be used?
-
Possible duplicate of [Difference between \_JAVA\_OPTIONS JAVA\_TOOL\_OPTIONS and JAVA\_OPTS](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28327620/difference-between-java-options-java-tool-options-and-java-opts) – Vadzim Oct 27 '15 at 20:27
2 Answers
JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS
is read by some JDK tools, but has limited applicability.
JAVA_OPTS
is a convention used by Apache Tomcat and some other apps, but is not
read directly by any JDK tools published by Sun/Oracle, AFAIK.
From: https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=6438415
JAVA_OPTS is not an environment variable that the java executable will recognize on it's own. Instead, various scripts which wrap the start up of java will often use an environment variable named JAVA_OPTS to configure the java executable (for example, the tomcat startup script does this).

- 464,885
- 45
- 335
- 332

- 189
- 1
- 3
see "what is" doc and "tool options" doc
Basically, the JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS
is intended for use by development tools, monitoring tools and the like whereas JAVA_OPTS
is used for running 'general' Java programs, I think people tend to mix and match somewhat (from what Google has shown me example wise).

- 23,966
- 9
- 79
- 68

- 3,287
- 21
- 26
-
One real-world example: JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS is used by TeamCity CI to pass settings to step runners such as "Simple Build Tool" (Scala SBT), and users need use JAVA_OPTS in order to not clobber the implicit system parameters passed on by the TeamCity server such as - http_proxy could be one of these. – conny Aug 16 '21 at 11:17
-
Another difference is that when JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS is defined, a message is always echoed to stdout, like `Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -XX:+UseG1GC -Xmx4G`. – conny Aug 16 '21 at 11:28
-
If it's of value for readers using later JVMs, those links above can be found also for [java 17](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/specs/jvmti.html#tooloptions) or [java 11](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/specs/jvmti.html#tooloptions). – charlie arehart Feb 11 '22 at 21:04