ng2 - injecting a provider into a regular class

Question

I can typically inject any provider into my components, but is this limited to components? Is there any way to inject ActivatedRoute into a regular class which is used in this context:

app.module.ts

@NgModule({
  ...
  providers: [
    AuthenticatedRequestOptions,
    { provide: RequestOptions, useClass: AuthenticatedRequestOptions }
  ],
  ...
})

authenticated-request-options.model.ts

@Injectable()
export class AuthenticatedRequestOptions extends BaseRequestOptions {
    constructor(@Inject(ActivatedRoute) public route: ActivatedRoute) {
        super();
        console.log('route', this.route);
    }
}

Günter Zöchbauer · Accepted Answer · 2016-11-09T13:46:51.720

1

Just add it as parameter to your constructor

constructor(route: ActivatedRoute, private injector: Injector) {}

AuthenticatedRequestOptions needs to be provided somewhere @Component(), @NgModule(), ... and the class needs to have the @Injectable() decorator

@Injectable()
export class AuthenticatedRequestOptions extends BaseRequestOptions {

and the class needs to be injected itself.
If you create an instance with new AuthenticatedRequestOptions(...) Angulars DI is not involved and you need to pass parameters yourself.

edited Nov 09 '16 at 13:46

answered Nov 09 '16 at 13:44

Günter Zöchbauer

623,577
216
2,003
1,567

As I mentioned, this didn't work either. injector is undefined in my example – parliament Nov 09 '16 at 13:45
I extended my answer. – Günter Zöchbauer Nov 09 '16 at 13:47
I updated my question with new code that follows these suggestions and still injects nothing. – parliament Nov 09 '16 at 13:55
You don't need `@Inject(ActivatedRoute)` if the type is the same `route:ActivatedRoute`. It's just redundant. Otherwise I can't tell from the code you provided. The root cause has to be somewhere else. The code in the question is fine now. Can you reproduce in a Plunker? Plunker provides a ready-to-use Angular2TS template with the "New" button. – Günter Zöchbauer Nov 09 '16 at 13:57
That's so greate about Plunker. Just creating one solves losts of issues ;-) – Günter Zöchbauer Nov 09 '16 at 14:06
1

Indeed, I realized the issue while making it. You're right, the issue was elsewhere. I needed to extend `RequestOptions` not `BaseRequestionOptions`. Commented on this here, where I got the original code: http://stackoverflow.com/a/39866166/1267778 – parliament Nov 09 '16 at 14:09

score 1 · Answer 2 · answered Nov 09 '16 at 13:49

@Inject allows to inject dependencies into providers even if they don't have @Injectable decorator, the proper syntax is:

export class AuthenticatedRequestOptions extends BaseRequestOptions {
   constructor(@Inject(ActivatedRoute) private route: ActivatedRoute) {
   ...

In order for a provider class to make use of type annotation for DI it should have @Injectable decorator:

@Injectable()
export class AuthenticatedRequestOptions extends BaseRequestOptions {
   constructor(private route: ActivatedRoute) {
   ...

I updated my question with new code that follows these suggestions and still injects nothing. — parliament, Nov 09 '16 at 13:55

ng2 - injecting a provider into a regular class

2 Answers2