What I am trying to do is export a figure as STL, U3D, anything which would get me a step further into including these plots as 3D PDFs in a LaTeX document. From the reading I have done, it is straightforward to convert a surface/quiver into U3D either using this add-on or through a STL conversion.
However, both of these approaches seem incapable of converting a three-dimensional line such as the one I have:
temp = [15.2697 671.323 -9.91231;
26.9127 766.25 -9.73684;
40.6373 863.993 -9.50037;
56.4426 963.955 -9.21152;
74.4579 1069 -8.96309;
94.902 1177 -8.75421;
117.824 1287 -8.48337;
143.176 1400 -8.20126;
171.07 1515 -7.93761;
201.032 1629 -7.66941;
232.849 1742 -7.57231;
265.95 1855 -7.5369;
298.406 1964 -7.4525;
334.686 2073 -7.3278;
294.999 1942 -7.4535;
235.956 1723 -7.90447;
203.222 1576 -8.31706;
180.908 1462 -8.70754];
plot3(temp(:,1),temp(:,2),temp(:,3));
Firstly, it sounds impossible for me to use the STL approach as I would have to triangulate data which cannot be triangulated (compared to a surface).
The first add-on I mentioned above, however, thinks that this is a quiver plot and then fails saying that it needs either a surface or a patch object (though the readme does suggest lines are also possible).
Overall, however, both of these feel too complicated for something which should have a driver inside Matlab. Am I missing an obvious simple solution for this problem?