This should be faster than using jQuery (but a bit more to type):
var xpath = "//div[text()='UniqueText']";
var result = document.evaluate(xpath,
document, null, XPathResult.FIRST_ORDERED_NODE_TYPE);
var node = result.singleNodeValue;
if (node) {
console.log(node.className);
} else {
console.error("Not found!");
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div class="_className">UniqueText</div>
The reason is, browser's CSS selectors don't support :contains
selector, and jQuery needs to emulate it by checking every node matching the rest of the selector. Ditto for using .filter
. But XPath is done natively by the browser.
You also cannot specify exact match using the jQuery :contains
, like here. If substring matching was indeed needed, you can change the XPath:
var xpath = "//div[contains(text(),'UniqueText')]";
XPath is very powerful, but a bit finicky and largely unknown, so I find it is very under-utilised, even when its use would be a perfect fit.