Difference between typedef struct and struct in a function in C

Question

I got the following code I am analyzing, and I am not really sure about the typedef struct and struct in functions. In global the following code is:

typedef struct
{
    float width, height, start;
    unsigned int *pixmap;
}arguments;

But when I look at a function in the same program below I can find this:

  struct arguments{
    float start;
    float width;
    float height;
    unsigned int *pixmap;
  };

My question is, is it necassary to add this struct arguments in the function since i already declared it in global?

You could probably use any of them as long as you are aware that the order of the members is different. — Gerhardh, Dec 28 '16 at 21:50
"when I look at a function in the same program". What do you mean by that? I'm guessing that the `struct` is not defined inside a function (it could be but I'm guessing that's not what you mean). You probably mean in the same file as a function that uses it. If that is the case then the answer is "it depends". It depends where the `typedef` is defined and whether the function can see it. We don't have your full code context and can't tell whether that is the case or not. — kaylum, Dec 28 '16 at 21:54

score 3 · Answer 1 · edited May 23 '17 at 10:30

3

Not necessarily. Since the struct is declared in global scope, you can still use it. Just keep in mind the differences between typedef struct and struct which you can read up on here and know that the order of the members in the global struct is different than the order of the members in the function struct, which is also quite important.

edited May 23 '17 at 10:30

Community

1
1

answered Dec 28 '16 at 21:55

jonahisadev

48
7

1

@HaniMasta The order of the members is very important. – Iharob Al Asimi Dec 28 '16 at 22:21
The presence or absence of a structure tag is also very significant. – John Bollinger Dec 28 '16 at 22:40

score 1 · Answer 2 · answered Dec 28 '16 at 22:36

The data types whose declarations you present are not "compatible types" as the standard defines the term, and therefore they cannot be used interchangeably. For structure types to be compatible, they must have not only the same member names and types in the same order, but also the same tag. It is on the last point that the two differ.

In particular, your typedef defines the identifier arguments as an alias for a tagless structure type with the specified members. Where that identifier is in scope, you can use it as a type name. Indeed, because the structure type to which it refers has no tag, there is no other way to refer to that type.

The other declaration declares a structure type with tag arguments. Where that declaration is in scope, you can refer to that type as struct arguments, but not as just arguments (C++ differs on this point):

struct arguments my_arguments;

my_arguments.width = 5;
// ...

My question is, is it necassary to add this struct arguments in the function since i already declared it in global?

C has no global declarations. It has file-scope declarations, and by default these declare functions and objects with external linkage, which means they can be accessed from anywhere in the program. That's not quite the same thing. Wherever you use either of those types, therefore, a declaration for it must be in scope. One ordinarily puts shared declarations in a header file to make it easy to fulfill such requirements. In any case, a declaration of one of those types does not serve as a declaration of the other.

You could, however, consider making them compatible by tagging the typedefed structure, either in one declaration ...

typedef struct arguments  // <--- note the tag here
{
    float width, height, start;
    unsigned int *pixmap;
} arguments;

... or in two ...

struct arguments
{
    float width, height, start;
    unsigned int *pixmap;
};

typedef struct arguments arguments;

Either alternative makes arguments an alias for type struct arguments.

Difference between typedef struct and struct in a function in C

2 Answers2