I want to implement SHA512 hashing using a salt. I started here, leading to this mcve:
import java.security.MessageDigest;
import org.junit.Test;
public class Sha512Mcve {
private final String ENCODING = "ISO-8859-1";
@Test
public void test() {
System.out.println(computeHashFor("whatever"));
}
private String computeHashFor(String toHash) {
String salt = "salt";
MessageDigest md;
try {
md = MessageDigest.getInstance("SHA-512");
// md.update(salt.getBytes(ENCODING));
byte[] bytes = md.digest(toHash.getBytes(ENCODING));
return toUnixRepresentation(salt, bytes);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
private String toUnixRepresentation(String salt, byte[] bytes) {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.append("$6$");
sb.append(salt);
sb.append("$");
for (int i = 0; i < bytes.length; i++) {
int c = bytes[i] & 0xFF;
if (c < 16) sb.append("0");
sb.append(Integer.toHexString(c));
}
return sb.toString();
}
}
Thing is: when I leave the line md.update()
commented out, this code gives me the exact same results as some online hash generators (like this one).
For example, hashing the word "whatever" gives a hash value ae3d....63a.
But when I run my code with that salt operation; I get different results (again compared against that online tool, which allows to set a salt string, too).
My implementation results in 413...623; the online tool says F25...686.
Any explanation in which way "salting" leads to "implementation specific" results?
Is there something I should do differently in my code?