As @Kie mentioned, configure_endpoint
implementation won't be enough, if you're going to stub the whole server-side within Selenium Python code. You would need a web server or whatever that will response via HTTP to requests from within testing environment.
It looks like the question is partially about testing of client-side code. What I see is that you're trying to make unit-test for client-side logic, but use integration testing suite in order to check this logic (it's strange).
The main idea is as follows.
You're trying to test client-side code. So, let's make mocks client-side too! Because this part of code is completely client-side related stuff.
If you actually want to have mocks, not stubs (watch the difference here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/3459491/882187) it is a better way to mock out HTTP requests inside your Javascript code. Just because you're testing a client-side piece of code, not some parts of server-side logic.
Having it isolated from whatever server-side is - is a great idea that you would love when your project become grow, while more and more endpoints will be appearing.
For example, you can use the following approach:
var restResponder = function() { // the original responder your client-side app will use
this.getCurrentPresident = function(successCallback) {
$.get('/presidents/current', callback);
}
};
var createMockResponder = function(president, party){ // factory that creates mocks
var myPresident = president;
var myParty = party;
return function() {
this.getCurrentPresident = function (successCallback) {
successCallback({"name": myPresident, "party": myParty});
}
};
}
// somewhere swap the original restResponder with new mockResponder created by 'createMockResponder'
// then use it in your app:
function drawColor(restResponder, backgroundEl) {
restResponder.getCurrentPresident(function(data){
if (data.party == "Democrat") $(backgroundEl).style('background-color', 'blue')
else if (data.party == "Republican") $(backgroundEl).style('background-color', 'red')
else console.info('Some strange response from server... Nevermind...');
});
}
Practically, this implementation depends on what do you have at the client-side as a framework. If jQuery
, then my example is enough, but it looks very wordy. In case you have something more advanced, like AngularJS
, you can do the same in 2-3 lines of code:
// Set up the mock http service responses
$httpBackend = $injector.get('$httpBackend');
// backend definition common for all tests
authRequestHandler = $httpBackend.when('GET', '/auth.py')
.respond({userId: 'userX'}, {'A-Token': 'xxx'});
Check out the docs: https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ngMock/service/$httpBackend
If you're still stick to the idea, that you need mocks inside Selenium tests, please
try this project: https://turq.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
It serves with Python DSL for describing REST responders.
Using turq
your mocks will look as follows:
path('/presidents/current').json({'name':'Barack Obama', 'party': 'Democrat'}, jsonp=False)
Also, I would recommend to try stubs instead of mocks and use this Python module: mock-server
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mock-server/0.3.7
You are required to create the directory layout containing corresponding pre-populated JSON responses and to add some boilerplate code in order to make the mock-server
respond on 'localhost:8080'. The directory layout for your example will look like this:
stub_obama/
presidents/
current/
GET_200.json # will contain {"name": "Barack Obama", "party": "Democrat"}
stub_trump/
presidents/
current/
GET_200.json # will contain {"name": "Donald Trump", "party": "Republican"}
But the mock_server
is based on Tornado, it is very heavy solution for using in tests I think.
I hope, my answer is helpful and informative. Welcome to discuss it! I made tons of projects with Selenium, big and small tests, tested client-side and server-side.