You must have a wrapper class in order not to clash deserialization strategies. Assume it's as follows:
final class SummonerResponse {
private final Summoner summoner;
private SummonerResponse(final Summoner summoner) {
this.summoner = summoner;
}
static SummonerResponse summonerResponse(final Summoner summoner) {
return new SummonerResponse(summoner);
}
Summoner getSummoner() {
return summoner;
}
}
Then you can either create a custom response deserializer:
final class SummonerWrapperDeserializer
implements JsonDeserializer<SummonerResponse> {
private static final JsonDeserializer<SummonerResponse> summonerDeserializer = new SummonerWrapperDeserializer();
private SummonerWrapperDeserializer() {
}
static JsonDeserializer<SummonerResponse> getSummonerResponseDeserializer() {
return summonerDeserializer;
}
@Override
public SummonerResponse deserialize(final JsonElement jsonElement, final Type type, final JsonDeserializationContext context)
throws JsonParseException {
// Pick the root as a JSON object
final JsonObject outerJsonObject = jsonElement.getAsJsonObject();
// And check how many properties does it have
final Iterable<? extends Entry<String, JsonElement>> outerJsonObjectEntries = outerJsonObject.entrySet();
if ( outerJsonObject.size() != 1 ) {
throw new JsonParseException("Expected one property object, the actual properties are: " + getPropertyName(outerJsonObjectEntries));
}
// If it has only one property, just get the property and take its inner value
final JsonElement innerJsonElement = outerJsonObjectEntries.iterator().next().getValue();
// Once it's obtained, just delegate the parsing to a downstream parser - no need to create Summoner instances by hands
return summonerResponse(context.deserialize(innerJsonElement, Summoner.class));
}
private static Set<String> getPropertyName(final Iterable<? extends Entry<String, JsonElement>> entries) {
final Set<String> keys = new LinkedHashSet<>();
for ( final Entry<String, JsonElement> entry : entries ) {
keys.add(entry.getKey());
}
return keys;
}
}
Or save some memory (the JSON (de)serializers require some memory because they work with JSON trees) and create a more low level type adapter:
final class SummonerResponseTypeAdapterFactory
implements TypeAdapterFactory {
private static final TypeAdapterFactory summonerResponseTypeAdapterFactory = new SummonerResponseTypeAdapterFactory();
private SummonerResponseTypeAdapterFactory() {
}
static TypeAdapterFactory getSummonerResponseTypeAdapterFactory() {
return summonerResponseTypeAdapterFactory;
}
@Override
public <T> TypeAdapter<T> create(final Gson gson, final TypeToken<T> typeToken) {
// Check if we can handle SummonerResponse. Classes can be compared with `==`
if ( typeToken.getRawType() == SummonerResponse.class ) {
final TypeAdapter<SummonerResponse> typeAdapter = getSummonerResponseTypeAdapter(gson);
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
final TypeAdapter<T> castTypeAdapter = (TypeAdapter<T>) typeAdapter;
return castTypeAdapter;
}
return null;
}
}
final class SummonerResponseTypeAdapter
extends TypeAdapter<SummonerResponse> {
private final Gson gson;
private SummonerResponseTypeAdapter(final Gson gson) {
this.gson = gson;
}
static TypeAdapter<SummonerResponse> getSummonerResponseTypeAdapter(final Gson gson) {
return new SummonerResponseTypeAdapter(gson);
}
@Override
@SuppressWarnings("resource")
public void write(final JsonWriter out, final SummonerResponse summonerResponse)
throws IOException {
// The incoming object may be null
if ( summonerResponse == null && gson.serializeNulls() ) {
out.nullValue();
return;
}
// Generate the inner object
out.beginObject();
out.name(summonerResponse.getSummoner().name);
gson.toJson(summonerResponse.getSummoner(), Summoner.class, out);
out.endObject();
}
@Override
public SummonerResponse read(final JsonReader in)
throws IOException {
// is it a null?
if ( in.peek() == NULL ) {
return null;
}
// make sure that the inner read JSON contains an inner object
in.beginObject();
// ignore the name
in.nextName();
// delegate parsing to the backing Gson instance in order to apply downstream parsing
final Summoner summoner = gson.fromJson(in, Summoner.class);
// check if there are more properties within the inner object
if ( in.peek() == NAME ) {
throw new MalformedJsonException("Unexpected: " + in.nextName());
}
// consume the "}" token
in.endObject();
return summonerResponse(summoner);
}
}
Then any of the options above can be used like this:
final Gson gson = new GsonBuilder()
.registerTypeAdapter(SummonerResponse.class, getSummonerResponseDeserializer())
.create();
final SummonerResponse summonerResponse = gson.fromJson(JSON, SummonerResponse.class);
final Summoner summoner = summonerResponse.getSummoner();
out.println(summoner.id + " => " + summoner.name);
or
final Gson gson = new GsonBuilder()
.registerTypeAdapterFactory(getSummonerResponseTypeAdapterFactory())
.create();
final SummonerResponse summonerResponse = gson.fromJson(JSON, SummonerResponse.class);
final Summoner summoner = summonerResponse.getSummoner();
out.println(summoner.id + " => " + summoner.name);
out.println(gson.toJson(summonerResponse));
The outputs are
23519033 => Asalas77
and
23519033 => Asalas77
{"Asalas77":{"id":23519033,"name":"Asalas77","profileIconId":22,"revisionDate":1487214366000,"summonerLevel":30}}
respectively.