Is a move constructor generated when a class has a user-provided copy constructor?

Question

C++ standard says (12.8/9):

If the definition of a class X does not explicitly declare a move constructor, one will be implicitly declared as defaulted if and only if

• X does not have a user-declared copy constructor,
• X does not have a user-declared copy assignment operator,
• X does not have a user-declared move assignment operator, and
• X does not have a user-declared destructor.

But the following code (compiled with clang++ 3.8.0 and g++ 6.3.0) gives an empty output:

#include <iostream>


struct Foo
{
    
    Foo() = default;
    
    Foo(const Foo&)
    {
        std::cout << "Copy constructor" << std::endl;
    }
    
};


int main()
{
    Foo foo{Foo{}};
    
    (void)foo;
}

Is it a problem in clang++ and g++?

Upd. As @Piotr Skotnicki noted in comments a copy elision takes place here. The command-line key -fno-elide-constructors disables it for constructors in clang++ and g++.