No. Only the other way around.
When you have an object of a class you can refer to it by a reference of the same class or a parent class and not the reverse. This is probably not related to just Java.
Otherwise it wouldn't make sense. Suppose you have
class SuperClass {
public void method1() {};
}
class SubClass {
public void method2() {};
}
If you do
SubClass object = new SuperClass();
and then
object.method2();
then theoretically it should compile, because the reference is of type SubClass, but the object is of type SuperClass so it won't have such a method.