A legacy app does an INSERT on a table with an instead of trigger and subsequently uses the rowcount for further processing.
We now need to opt out of certain INSERTs with the use of an INSTEAD OF INSERT
trigger.
The problem is that @@ROWCOUNT still returns the number of attempted inserts.
For example, a fictitious trigger that will never complete an insert might be
ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[trig_ACCOUNT_CREDITS_RunningTotalINSERT]
ON [dbo].[ACCOUNT_CREDITS]
INSTEAD OF INSERT
AS
BEGIN
--tried with NOCOUNT ON and OFF
SET NOCOUNT OFF;
--This is an example of the branching logic that might determine
--whether or not to do the INSERT
IF 1=2 --no insert will ever occur (example only)
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dbo.ACCOUNT_CREDITS (COL1, COL2)
SELECT COL1, COL2 from INSERTED
END
END
and some INSERT statements might be
--No rows will be inserted because value of COL1 < 5
INSERT INTO dbo.ACCOUNT_CREDITS (COL1, COL2) VALUES ( 3, 3)
--We would assume row count to be 0, but returns 1
select @@ROWCOUNT
--No rows will be inserted because value of COL1 < 5
INSERT INTO dbo.ACCOUNT_CREDITS (COL1, COL2)
SELECT 1, 1
union all
SELECT 2, 2
--We would assume row count to be 0, but returns 2
select @@ROWCOUNT
I can work around the issue, but it bothers me that I can't trust @@ROWCOUNT. I can find no reference to this issue on SO or those other knowledge banks. Is this simply a case of TRIGGERS ARE EVIL?
Can I affect @@ROWCOUNT?