Solution is multi-fold complex:
inproc does not force you to have a common Context() instance, but it is handy to have one, as the signalling / messaging goes without any data-transfers, just by Zero-copy, pointer manipulations for in-RAM blocks of memory, which is extremely fast.
I started to assemble ZeroMQ-related facts about having some 70.000 ~ 200.000 file-descriptors available for "sockets", as supported by O/S kernel settings, but your published aims are higher. Much higher.
Given your git-published Multi-agent ABCE Project paper refers to nanosecond shaving, HPC-domain grade solution to have ( cit. / emphasis added: )
the whopping number of 1.073.545.225, many more agents than fit into the memory of even the most sophisticated supercomputer, some small hundreds of thousands of file-descriptors are not much worth spending time with.
Your Project faces multiple troubles at the same time.
Let's peel the problem layers off, step by step:
File Descriptors (FD) -- Linux O/S level -- System-wide Limits:
To see the actual as-is state:
edit /etc/sysctl.conf file
# vi /etc/sysctl.conf
Append a config directive as follows:
fs.file-max = 100000
Save and close the file.
Users need to log out and log back in again to changes take effect or just type the following command:
# sysctl -p
Verify your settings with command:
# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
( Max ) User-specific File Descriptors (FD) Limits:
Each user has additionally a set of ( soft-limit, hard-limit ):
# su - ABsinthCE
$ ulimit -Hn
$ ulimit -Sn
However, you can limit your ABsinthCE user ( or any other ) to any specific limits by editing /etc/security/limits.conf file, enter:
# vi /etc/security/limits.conf
Where you set ABsinthCE user the respective soft- and hard-limit as needed:
ABsinthCE soft nofile 123456
ABsinthCE hard nofile 234567
All that is not for free - each file descriptor takes up some kernel memory, so at some point you may and you will exhaust it. A few hundred thousands file descriptors are not trouble for server deployments, where event-based ( epoll on Linux ) server architectures are used. But simply straight forget to try to grow this anywhere near the said 1.073.545.225 level.
Today,
one can have a private HPC machine ( not a Cloud illusion ) with ~ 50-500 TB RAM.
But still, the multi-agent Project application architecture ought be re-defined, not to fail on extreme resources allocations ( just due to a forgiving syntax simplicity ).
Professional Multi-Agent simulators are right due to extreme scaling very, VERY CONSERVATIVE on per-Agent instance resource-locking.
So the best results are to be expected ( both performance-wise and latency-wise ) when using direct memory-mapped operations. ZeroMQ inproc:// transport-class is fine and does not require a Context() instance to allocate IO-thread ( as there is no data-pump at all, if using just inproc:// transport-class ), which is very efficient for a fast prototyping phase. The same approach will become risky for growing the scales much higher towards the levels expected in production.
Latency-shaving and accelerated-time simulator operations throughput scaling is the next set of targets, for raising both the Multi-Agent based simulations static scales and increasing the simulator performance.
For a serious nanoseconds hunting
follow the excellent Bloomberg's guru, John Lakos, insights on HPC.
Either pre-allocate ( as a common Best Practice in RTOS domain) and do not allocate at all, or follow John's fabulous testing-supported insights presented on ACCU 2017.
