Another solution would be to use Empty<T>.

msdn extract:

Returns an empty IEnumerable that has the specified type argument.

IEnumerable<object> a = Enumerable.Empty<object>();

There is a thread on SO about it: Is it better to use Enumerable.Empty() as opposed to new List to initialize an IEnumerable?

If you use an empty array or empty list, those are objects and they are stored in memory. The Garbage Collector has to take care of them. If you are dealing with a high throughput application, it could be a noticeable impact.

Enumerable.Empty does not create an object per call thus putting less load on the GC.

Since you now specified you want to add to it, what you want isn't a simple IEnumerable<T> but at least an ICollection<T>. I recommend simply using a List<T> like this:

List<object> myList=new List<object>();
myList.Add(1);
myList.Add(2);
myList.Add(3);

You can use myList everywhere an IEnumerable<object> is expected, since List<object> implements IEnumerable<object>.

(old answer before clarification)

You can't create an instance of IEnumerable<T> since it's a normal interface(It's sometimes possible to specify a default implementation, but that's usually used only with COM).

So what you really want is instantiate a class that implements the interface IEnumerable<T>. The behavior varies depending on which class you choose.

For an empty sequence use:

IEnumerable<object> e0=Enumerable.Empty<object>();

For an non empty enumerable you can use some collection that implements IEnumerable<T>. Common choices are the array T[], List<T> or if you want immutability ReadOnlyCollection<T>.

IEnumerable<object> e1=new object[]{1,2,3};
IEnumerable<object> e2=new List<object>(){1,2,3};
IEnumerable<object> e3=new ReadOnlyCollection(new object[]{1,2,3});

Another common way to implement IEnumerable<T> is the iterator feature introduced in C# 3:

IEnumerable<object> MyIterator()
{
  yield return 1;
  yield return 2;
  yield return 3;
}

IEnumerable<object> e4=MyIterator();

No you can't since IEnumerable is an interface.

You should be able to create an empty instance of most non-interface types which implement IEnumerable, e.g.:-

IEnumerable<object> a = new object[] { };

or

IEnumerable<object> a = new List<object>();

No, You cannot do that. Use the following line of code instead:

IEnumerable<int> usersIds = new List<int>() {1, 2, 3}.AsEnumerable();

I hope it helps.

The main reason is we can't create object of an interface, and IEnumerable is an interface. We need to create object of the class which implements the interface. This is the main reason we can't directly create object of IEnumerable.

You can do this:

IEnumerable<object> list = new List<object>(){1, 4, 5}.AsEnumerable();
CallFunction(list);

I wanted to create a new enumerable object or list and be able to add to it.

This comment changes everything. You can't add to a generic IEnumerable<T>. If you want to stay with the interfaces in System.Collections.Generic, you need to use a class that implements ICollection<T> like List<T>.

No IEnumerable is an interface, you can't create instance of interface

you can do something like this

IEnumerable<object> a = new object[0];

It's a pretty old question, but for the sake of newcomers, this is how we can protect an IEnumerable<T> from a null exception. Another word, to create an empty instance of a variable of type IEnumerable<T>

public IEnumerable<T> MyPropertyName { get; set; } = Enumerable.Empty<T>();

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.linq.enumerable.empty?view=net-5.0

Cheers.

I have been Implementing IEnumerable of type IEnumerable<T> by this way

IEnumerable<T> MyEnum = new T[]{ /*object of type T*/ };

Example:

var Object = new Book{id = 1,name = "Hello World"};
IEnumerable<Book> MyEnum = new Book[]{ Object };