There is another option that does not come with any need for stream suppression and that does not rely on undocumented or unsupported APIs. Using a Java agent, it is possible to redefine modules to export/open the required packages. The code for this would look something like this:
void exportAndOpen(Instrumentation instrumentation) {
Set<Module> unnamed =
Collections.singleton(ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader().getUnnamedModule());
ModuleLayer.boot().modules().forEach(module -> instrumentation.redefineModule(
module,
unnamed,
module.getPackages().stream().collect(Collectors.toMap(
Function.identity(),
pkg -> unnamed
)),
module.getPackages().stream().collect(Collectors.toMap(
Function.identity(),
pkg -> unnamed
)),
Collections.emptySet(),
Collections.emptyMap()
));
}
You can now run any illegal access without the warning as your application is contained in the unnamed module as for example:
Method method = ClassLoader.class.getDeclaredMethod("defineClass",
byte[].class, int.class, int.class);
method.setAccessible(true);
In order to get hold of the Instrumentation instance, you can either write a Java agent what is quite simple and specify it on the command line (rather than the classpath) using -javaagent:myjar.jar. The agent would only contain an premain method as follows:
public class MyAgent {
public static void main(String arg, Instrumentation inst) {
exportAndOpen(inst);
}
}
Alternatively, you can attach dynamically using the attach API which is made accessible conveniently by the byte-buddy-agent project (which I authored):
exportAndOpen(ByteBuddyAgent.install());
which you would need to call prior to the illegal access. Note that this is only available on JDKs and on Linux VM whereas you would need to supply the Byte Buddy agent on the command line as a Java agent if you needed it on other VMs. This can be convenient when you want the self-attachment on test and development machines where JDKs are typically installed.
As others pointed out, this should only serve as an intermediate solution but I fully understand that the current behavior often breaks logging crawlers and console apps which is why I have used this myself in production environments as a short-term solution to using Java 9 and so long I did not encounter any problems.
The good thing, however, is that this solution is robust towards future updates as any operation, even the dynamic attachment is legal. Using a helper process, Byte Buddy even works around the normally forbidden self-attachment.
