0

As I understand, on modern Linux, deadline scheduler is implemented using constant bandwidth server (CBS) and earliest deadline first (EDF). Say I assigned X number of processes to 6 out of 12 CPUs using cpuset. Assuming there's no other significant process running on the 6 CPUs. In this case, I feel that using SCHED_DEADLINE on all X processes (with default budget and period) has no difference from just using normal completely fair scheduler, because both would cause all X processes to be run for equal amount of CPU time. Is my understanding correct?

Claudio
  • 10,614
  • 4
  • 31
  • 71
mr49
  • 1,053
  • 1
  • 8
  • 26

1 Answers1

1

There are at least 2 differences:

  • The SCHED_DEADLINE tasks preempt any other task as long as they are not blocked and the runtime is not exhausted.
  • The SCHED_DEADLINE tasks gets throttled when their runtime is exhausted, even if they are not blocked and the system is idle.

A further note: starting from kernel 4.13, the CBS algorithm has been replaced by GRUB, which also supports bandwidth reclaiming.

Claudio
  • 10,614
  • 4
  • 31
  • 71