91

Given a list of words, return a list with the same words in order of length (longest to shortest), the second sort criteria should be alphabetical. Hint: you need think of two functions.

This is what I have so far:

def bylength(word1,word2):
    return len(word2)-len(word1)

def sortlist(a):
    a.sort(cmp=bylength)
    return a

it sorts by length but I don't know how to apply the second criteria to this sort, which is by alphabetical descending.

Karl Knechtel
  • 62,466
  • 11
  • 102
  • 153
Adrian
  • 7,651
  • 4
  • 18
  • 12

6 Answers6

186

You can do it in two steps like this:

the_list.sort() # sorts normally by alphabetical order
the_list.sort(key=len, reverse=True) # sorts by descending length

Python's sort is stable, which means that sorting the list by length leaves the elements in alphabetical order when the length is equal.

You can also do it like this:

the_list.sort(key=lambda item: (-len(item), item))

Generally you never need cmp, it was even removed in Python3. key is much easier to use.

Jochen Ritzel
  • 104,512
  • 31
  • 200
  • 194
7
n = ['aaa', 'bbb', 'ccc', 'dddd', 'dddl', 'yyyyy']

for i in reversed(sorted(n, key=len)):
    print i

yyyyy dddl dddd ccc bbb aaa

for i in sorted(n, key=len, reverse=True):
     print i

yyyyy dddd dddl aaa bbb ccc

Ninjakannon
  • 3,751
  • 7
  • 53
  • 76
Arindam Roychowdhury
  • 5,927
  • 5
  • 55
  • 63
  • This only works if the array is already sorted. Only `sorted( sorted( iterable ), key=len )` gives the correct answer always. – Evandro Coan Jun 16 '18 at 18:46
  • @user I just tried with unsorted array . Getting the same (correct) result . Can you please provide your input array ? – Arindam Roychowdhury Jun 18 '18 at 07:36
  • `sorted( ['bb', 'b', 'aa', 'a'], key=len, reverse=True)` produces `['bb', 'aa', 'b', 'a']`, but it should be `['aa', 'bb', 'a', 'b']` as get from `sorted( sorted( ['bb', 'b', 'aa', 'a'] ), key=len, reverse=True)` – Evandro Coan Jun 18 '18 at 13:48
  • This is simply sorting by string length in descending order. – frederick99 Sep 21 '21 at 23:09
3
-Sort your list by alpha order, then by length.

See the following exmple:

>>> coursesList = ["chemistry","physics","mathematics","art"]
>>> sorted(coursesList,key=len)
['art', 'physics', 'chemistry', 'mathematics']
>>> coursesList.append("mopsosa")
>>> sorted(coursesList,key=len)
['art', 'physics', 'mopsosa', 'chemistry', 'mathematics']
>>> coursesList.sort()
>>> sorted(coursesList,key=len)
['art', 'mopsosa', 'physics', 'chemistry', 'mathematics']
jyfar
  • 185
  • 1
  • 3
2

First sort by Alphabet and then sort by Length.

Here is a working example

mylist.sort()
mylist = sorted(mylist, key=len, reverse=False)

# Print the items on individual line
for i in mylist:
    print(i)
Naveed Abbas
  • 1,157
  • 1
  • 14
  • 37
-1

Although Jochen Ritzel said you don't need cmp, this is actually a great use case for it! Using cmp you can sort by length and then alphabetically at the same time in half the time sorting twice would take!

def cmp_func(a, b):
    # sort by length and then alphabetically in lowercase
    if len(a) == len(b):
        return cmp(a, b)
    return cmp(len(a), len(b))

sorted_the_way_you_want = sorted(the_list, cmp=cmp_func)

Example:

>>> the_list = ['B', 'BB', 'AA', 'A', 'Z', 'C', 'D']
>>> sorted(the_list, cmp=cmp_func)
['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'Z', 'AA', 'BB']

Note, if your list is a mix of upper and lower case replace cmp(a, b) with cmp(a.lower(), b.lower()) as python sorts 'a' > 'Z'.

In python3 you'd need to be sorting objects with __lt__ style comparison functions defined or functools.cmp_to_key() which does that for you.

theannouncer
  • 1,148
  • 16
  • 28
-2
def cmp_func(a, b):
    # sort by length and then alphabetically in lowercase
    if len(a) == len(b):
        return cmp(a, b)
    return cmp(len(a), len(b))

sorted_the_way_you_want = sorted(the_list, cmp=cmp_func)
tbraun89
  • 2,246
  • 3
  • 25
  • 44
  • You need to sourround your code with ``` or prepend 4 spaces to put it in code blocks. – ljmc May 13 '22 at 13:20
  • 1
    As it’s currently written, your answer is unclear. Please [edit] to add additional details that will help others understand how this addresses the question asked. You can find more information on how to write good answers [in the help center](/help/how-to-answer). – ljmc May 13 '22 at 13:20
  • [A code-only answer is not high quality](//meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/392712/explaining-entirely-code-based-answers). While this code may be useful, you can improve it by saying why it works, how it works, when it should be used, and what its limitations are. Please [edit] your answer to include explanation and link to relevant documentation. – Stephen Ostermiller Feb 09 '23 at 10:29