1

I have a Mercurial server on a simple server (Virtual Machine (VM)), and about 100 users with access. And from time to time, requests have been slow.

And since I can not change the hardware of this server, because the VM server no longer has available resources, and migrating it would do a great job.

I would like to know it is possible to have 2 mercurial servers, using the same database, because this would balance the load, and in one server would put a large team, and in the other the other teams. In short, I can not mess with the server you're on today.

VM: 

Windows Server 2003 SP2  
1.5GB Memory  
60GB HD

Settings: 

Python 2.7.2  
Mercurial 2.5.4  
RhodeCode 1.6.0rc1

Note:
Sorry if you're confused, this question was translated via google. If you can edit and rearrange it, I'll be very grateful.
Marcos Zolnowski
  • 2,751
  • 1
  • 24
  • 29
David
  • 280
  • 1
  • 6
  • 15
  • 1
    Mercurial 2.5.4 is very old. If you're concerned about performance you may want to try updating mercurial on your server. There have been a large number of performance improvements since 2.5.4. – ngoldbaum Oct 26 '17 at 13:31

1 Answers1

1

This is certainly possible. If you have shares storage RhodeCode can use the same DB and load-balance load between machines.

Btw, 1.6.0 is very old I'd take a chance at upgrading this.

marcinkuzminski
  • 1,751
  • 14
  • 11
  • I can not create an environment to test if upgrading would have no problem, but thanks for the answer, I'll search on what I said. – David Oct 25 '17 at 19:18