I have read the documentation for np.unravel_index
and played around with the function, but I can't figure out what it is doing.

- 24,552
- 19
- 101
- 135

- 956
- 1
- 8
- 11
-
1Converts the linear indices to indexes along each of the axes given the shape of the nd-grid that forms those axes. [`Here's some explanation`](https://stackoverflow.com/a/38674038/) going the other way for `np.ravel_multi_index`. – Divakar Jan 07 '18 at 09:15
6 Answers
Computer memory is addressed linearly. Each memory cell corresponds to a number. A block of memory can be addressed in terms of a base, which is the memory address of its first element, and the item index. For example, assuming the base address is 10,000:
item index 0 1 2 3
memory address 10,000 10,001 10,002 10,003
To store multi-dimensional blocks, their geometry must somehow be made to fit into linear memory. In C
and NumPy
, this is done row-by-row. A 2D example would be:
| 0 1 2 3
--+------------------------
0 | 0 1 2 3
1 | 4 5 6 7
2 | 8 9 10 11
So, for example, in this 3-by-4 block the 2D index (1, 2)
would correspond to the linear index 6
which is 1 x 4 + 2
.
unravel_index
does the inverse. Given a linear index, it computes the corresponding ND
index. Since this depends on the block dimensions, these also have to be passed. So, in our example, we can get the original 2D index (1, 2)
back from the linear index 6
:
>>> np.unravel_index(6, (3, 4))
(1, 2)
Note: The above glosses over a few details. 1) Translating the item index to memory address also has to account for item size. For example, an integer typically has 4 or 8 bytes. So, in the latter case, the memory address for item i
would be base + 8 x i
. 2). NumPy is a bit more flexible than suggested. It can organize ND
data column-by-column if desired. It can even handle data that are not contiguous in memory but for example leave gaps, etc.
Bonus reading: internal memory layout of an ndarray

- 57,311
- 13
- 161
- 150

- 51,835
- 3
- 54
- 99
-
1I'm just curious to understand this a bit more. Where can I find more information regarding this? Any suggestions please? – kmario23 Jan 08 '18 at 02:16
-
3@kmario23 https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/arrays.ndarray.html – Paul Panzer Jan 08 '18 at 02:24
-
1@kmario23, you may access it here https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/generated/numpy.unravel_index.html. This is from the official documentation – Shiva Shankar May 31 '23 at 03:20
-
For a square matrix, the indices can be calculated: ```np.unravel_index(i, (n, n)) == (i//n, i%n)``` – Andy Aug 13 '23 at 21:29
We will start with an example in the documentation.
>>> np.unravel_index([22, 41, 37], (7,6))
(array([3, 6, 6]), array([4, 5, 1]))
First, (7,6)
specifies the dimension of target array that we want to turn the indices back into. Second, [22, 41, 37]
are some indices on this array if the array is flattened. If a 7 by 6 array is flattened, its indices will look like
[ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,
17, 18, 19, 20, 21, *22*, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, *37*, 38, 39, 40, *41*]
If we unflatten these indices back to their original positions in a dim (7, 6)
array, it would be
[[ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
[ 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11],
[12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17],
[18, 19, 20, 21, *22*, 23], <- (3, 4)
[24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29],
[30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35],
[36, *37*, 38, 39, 40, *41*]]
(6, 1) (6,5)
The return values of the unravel_index
function tell you what should have been the indices of [22, 41, 37] if the array is not flattened. These indices should have been [(3, 4), (6, 5), (6,1)]
if the array is not flattened. In other words, the function transfers the indices in a flatten array back to its unflatten version.
https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.13.0/reference/generated/numpy.unravel_index.html

- 7,684
- 3
- 29
- 49
-
Frankly I think the output should have been [(3, 4), (6, 5), (6,1)] in your example instead of its transpose in the documentation, in order to consistent with the output of np.unravel_index(1621, (6,7,8,9)) being (3, 1, 4, 1) – SYK Jan 14 '21 at 23:03
This isn't different in content than the other two answers, but it might be more intuitive. If you have a 2-D matrix, or array, you can reference it in different ways. You could type the (row, col), to get the value at (row, col), or you can give each cell a single-number index. unravel_index just translates between these two ways of referencing values in a matrix.
This is extendable to dimensions larger than 2. You should also be aware of np.ravel_multi_index(), which performs the reverse transformation. Note that it requires the (row, col) and the shape of the array.
I also see I have two 10s in the index matrix--whoops.

- 592
- 8
- 17
-
4This is actually exactly what I was looking for as far as intuition goes, thank you. May I ask, is the motivation for doing this simply because it makes calculations less computationally complex/easier to store in memory? – austinkjensen May 02 '18 at 17:18
-
3I would imagine there are many reasons/applications. One way I've used it significantly is this: I have a skeleton of single-width pixels that I need to walk along and return coordinates of where I've walked. It's much simpler for me to work in the "index" space rather than the "row, col" space because it cuts the number of operations in half. For example, if you want to see if you've already walked to (2,1), you'd have to check for 2, then check for 1. With indexing, I just check for "7". Basic example, but it really simplifies things. And to reiterate, there are many other applications :) – Jon May 02 '18 at 17:24
I can explain it with very simple example. This is for np.ravel_multi_index as well as np.unravel_index
>>> X = np.array([[4, 2],
[9, 3],
[8, 5],
[3, 3],
[5, 6]])
>>> X.shape
(5, 2)
Find where all the value 3 presents in X:
>>> idx = np.where(X==3)
>>> idx
(array([1, 3, 3], dtype=int64), array([1, 0, 1], dtype=int64))
i.e. x = [1,3,3]
, y = [1,0,1]
It returns the x, y of indices (because X is 2-dimensional).
If you apply ravel_multi_index for idx
obtained:
>>> idx_flat = np.ravel_multi_index(idx, X.shape)
>>> idx_flat
array([3, 6, 7], dtype=int64)
idx_flat
is a linear index of X where value 3 presents.
From the above example, we can understand:
- ravel_multi_index converts multi-dimensional indices (nd array) into single-dimensional indices (linear array)
- It works only on indices i.e. both input and output are indices
The result indices will be direct indices of X.ravel()
. You can verify in the below x_linear
:
>>> x_linear = X.ravel()
>>> x_linear
array([4, 2, 9, 3, 8, 5, 3, 3, 5, 6])
Whereas, unravel_index is very simple, just reverse of above (np.ravel_multi_index)
>>> idx = np.unravel_index(idx_flat , X.shape)
>>> idx
(array([1, 3, 3], dtype=int64), array([1, 0, 1], dtype=int64))
Which is same as idx = np.where(X==3)
- unravel_index converts single-dimensional indices (linear array) into multi-dimensional indices (nd array)
- It works only on indices i.e. both input and output are indices

- 505
- 4
- 16

- 6,448
- 2
- 41
- 37
Given a raveled_index
into a .ravel()
ed array, np.unravel_index
figures out the equivalent unraveled index into the base array:
import numpy as np
my_array = np.random.random((100, 42))
raveled_array = my_array.ravel()
raveled_index = 1337
unraveled_index = np.unravel_index(raveled_index, my_array.shape)
assert raveled_array[raveled_index] == my_array[unraveled_index]
Two nice to knows:
A
raveled_array
is also called aflat_array
; hence araveled_index
orflat_index
is nothing but an index into the "flattened" array. Further, since the flat array has "lost" its original shape information you need to add this when callingnp.unravel_index
.The
unraveled_index
is typically called amulti_index
. This is because you need multiple values (an N-tuple) to index an element in any array withmy_array.dim == N
. The inverse ofnp.unravel_index
is thus callednp.ravel_multi_index
.

- 2,880
- 1
- 18
- 32
This is only applicable for the 2D case, but the two coordinates np.unravel_index functions returns in this case are equivalent to doing floor division and applying the modulo function respectively.
for j in range(1,1000):
for i in range(j):
assert(np.unravel_index(i,(987654321,j))==(i//j,i%j))
The first element of the shape array (ie 987654321) is meaningless except to put an upper bound on how large an unraveled linear index can be passed through the function.

- 89
- 6