Coming from a C++ background, I'm trying to figure out how arguments are passed into methods in Elisp. While I acknowledge that maybe the wording could be different, I'm wondering if it is closer to the C++ idea of passing by reference or passing by value? If I alter the parameter in the method itself, will it alter the parameter that was passed in in the function call?
2 Answers
All Lisps (Emacs Lisp, Common Lisp) pass parameters by value, always:
(defparameter x 42) ; defconst in Emacs Lisp
(defun test (x)
(setq x 10))
(test x)
==> 10
x
==> 42
Note, however, that some values are actually pointers (or, rather, objects with components), so a function can modify their content by side effects:
(defparameter x (list 1 2))
(defun test (x)
(setf (first x) 42
(second x) 24
x 17))
(test x)
==> 17
x
==> (42 24)
PS1. Cf. When to use ' (or quote) in Lisp? -- "quoted arguments" are evaluated too: the evaluation strips the quote.
PS2. Cf. add-to-list
- it accepts a symbol (variable name) and modifies its value. This only works for global dynamic variables, not for lexical variables. Not a very good idea.

- 58,617
- 29
- 161
- 278
Actually, in Emacs Lisp, there is no such thing like passing a argument by value or by reference, not to mention pointer. But all arguments passed to function will be evaluated in advance except those have a '
prefix. Always remember When you set a variable, you always just create symbol with a value.[1]
So if you want to modify a variable's value in a function, all you need to do is modifying the value of that variable's symbol in that function.
Check my code bellow.
(defvar my-val 1)
(defun my-func-value (val)
(setq val 2))
(defun my-func-symbol (sym)
;; NOTE! using set instead of setq,
;; casue we want symbol "my-val" be evaluated from "sym" here
(set sym 2))
(my-func-value my-val) ; evaluate my-val before passed into function
(message "my-val: %s" my-val) ; my-val: 1
(my-func-symbol 'my-val) ; pass my-val symbol directly into function
(message "my-val: %s" my-val) ; my-val: 2
Note! If the variable is a lexically-bound variable[2], it's still true that you can modified the symbol's value but not the value in the lexical environment.
Here is the code:
(let ((my-lexical-var 1))
(my-func-symbol 'my-lexical-var)
;; evaluate from lexical environment
(message "my-lexical-var: %s" my-lexical-var) ; my-lexical-var: 1
;; evaluate from the symbol
(message "symbol my-lexical-var: %s" (symbol-value 'my-lexical-var))
; symbol my-lexical-var: 2

- 737
- 1
- 7
- 21
-
2All function arguments are always evaluated. `'` is not a prefix, but a reader macro to abbreviate the [quote form](https://stackoverflow.com/q/134887/850781), which evaluates to its second term. – sds Jan 16 '19 at 14:34
-
Yes, I know it's a quote form, but also like a prefix to that variable. Anyway you are missing the point. Did you check out my code snipe above, that's what I try to point out.@sds – Francis Jan 17 '19 at 01:28
-
Note that if the variable has *lexical* scope (which isn't the case here), then it's not true that passing the variable's symbol allows you to modify the variable's value with `set` (because the lexical value and the symbol's value are not the same thing). – phils Jan 17 '19 at 03:31