The "best" option does not exist. It depends on how you define "best".
Here are some solutions, each with their own advantages and disadvantages:
Using map
template <class T>
auto has_duplicates(const std::vector<T>& v) -> bool
{
std::unordered_map<T, int> m;
for (const auto& e : v)
{
++m[e];
if (m[e] > 1)
return true;
}
return false;
}
Using set
template <class T>
auto has_duplicates(const std::vector<T>& v) -> bool
{
std::unordered_set<int> s;
std::copy(v.begin(), v.end(), std::inserter(s, s.begin());
return v.size() != s.size();
}
Using sort and adjacent_find (mutating range)
template <class T>
auto has_duplicates(std::vector<T>& v) -> bool
{
std::sort(v.begin(), v.end());
return std::adjacent_find(v.begin(), v.end()) != v.last();
}
Manual iteration with std::find
template <class T>
auto has_duplicates(const std::vector<T>& v) -> bool
{
for (auto it = v.begin(); it != v.end(); ++it)
if (std::find(it + 1, v.end(), *it) != v.end())
return true;
return false;
}
Manual iteration
template <class T>
auto has_duplicates(const std::vector<T>& v) -> bool
{
for (auto i1 = v.begin(); i1 != v.end(); ++i1)
for (auto i2 = i1 + 1; i2 != v.end(); ++i2)
if (*i1 == *i2)
return true;
return false;
}